Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
NavIn Kumar @ NavIn Kumar NavIn Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42652 of 2010 Navin Kumar @ Navin Kumar Navin, Son of Sri Uttamchandra Das, R/o Village Mirzapur, P.S. Rosera, District Samastipur. -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 08/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code and of Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, who is his one and only wife and likewise himself also appointed as Panchayat teacher. Further, petitioner has already filed one Matrimonial Case No. 87 of...
Pawan Paswan @ Pawan Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1024 of 2012 ====================================================== Pawan Paswan @ Pawan Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband posted in the military is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 379, 498A, 494, 120 (B), 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On the instructions counsels for both sides submit that both are ready for reconciliation. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the petitioner and complainant appear before the learned court below on 27th February 2012 when the petitioner will take the complainant to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesai...
Bikas Kumar Mandal and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.56 of 2012 Bikas Kumar Mandal & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard Md. Najmul Hoda, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M. Haque, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 20.08.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. One Auto rickshaw of the informant was robbed. From possession of petitioner no.1 the battery of Auto rickshaw was recovered. There is no recovery from petitioner no.2. Though both petitioners have been identified by the informant during T. I. Parade. The supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioners to the effect that petitioner no. 1 is involved in one other case in which he is on bail whereas petitioner no.2 has no criminal antecedent. 2 Considering the period under...
Smt.Dipkali Devi and Vs. Kamta Rai and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.157 of 1982 Smt.Dipkali Devi & Versus Kamta Rai & Ors ---------------------------------- 63. 13.01.2012 The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that appeal notices were issued to respondent nos.5(iii) to 5(ix) and on other respondents. The appeal notice returned unserved so far other respondents are concerned but so far respondent nos.5(iii) to 5(ix) are concerned, they refused to receive the notice. In such circumstances, the notice on respondent nos.5(iii) to 5(ix) is accepted as valid service. So far show cause notice and appeal notice on the respondents mentioned in the office note dated 12.01.2012 is concerned, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the appellants, three weeks time is granted to take fresh steps for appeal notice on respondent nos.4(a) to 4(g), 5(i), 5(ii) and show cause notice in substitution matter on respondent no.1(4) in ordinary process. Peremptory. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)...
Krishna Kant Singh @ Krishnanand Sharma@ Krishnandan Singh Vs. the Sta ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1767 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14270 of 2005 With Interlocutory Application No. 8018 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1767 of 2011 ====================================================== Krishna Kant Singh @ Krishnanand Sharma @ Krishnandan Singh .... .... Appellant Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Laxmi Narayan Das, Advocate Mr. S. De, Advocate For the Respondent No.5: Mr. A.K.Singh No.-3, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 13-01-2012 Learned advocate has not filed the requisites. Respondent no.5 has entered appearance. Requisites for notice to respondent no.6 be filed within five days from today, failing which the Appeal shall ...
Ramashray Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.9 o1. Ramashray Singh s/o late Tilak Singh.2. Rakesh Kumar.3. Mukesh Singh. Both sons of Ramashray Singh.4. Awalesh Singh son of late Mundrika Singh.5. Ajant Kumar son of Saryug Singh.6. Gupta Singh son of Uma Singh. All residents of village- Bhawanibigha, P.S. Silao, District- Nalanda. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 1.2012 This appeal will be heard. Call for lower court records. As per prosecution case, upon order of appellant no.1, Vinay Singh (non appellant) fired fatal shot. The rest of the appellants have been convicted by aid of Section 149/109 of the Indian Penal Code. In that view of the matter, let above named appellants, during the pendency of the appeal, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court i.e. 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif i...
Abdul Mannan and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.303 of 2012 Abdul Mannan & Ors. Versus The State of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 25.06.2011 passed in Complaint Case No. 305 of 2011 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Katihar while finding a prima facie case against the petitioners has been pleased to issue summons for trial for the offence punishable under Sections 418 and 467 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land in question had been purchased by one Bibi Kadbano @ Sahar Banoo from one Ajimuddin way back in the year 1972 and a copy of the sale deed is placed at Annexure-4. It is stated that the land in question i.e. plot bearing Khata No. 225 Plot No. 8140 having an area of 0.43 decimals situated in Mauza Amdabad in the District of Katihar...
The State of Bihar and ors Vs. Janki Gope
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No. 1626 of 2010 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 180 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary Home (Police) Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.2. The District Magistrate, Nawada.3. The Anchal Adhikari, Akbarpur, Distt. Nawada. .... .... Appellants. Versus Janki Gope, S/o. Late Baiju Mahto, R/o. Vill.- Maheshdih, P.S.- Akbarpur, Distt.- Nawada. .... .... Respondent. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. B. S. Pandey, A. C. to A. A. G. VII. For the Respondent : Dr. Dayanand Jha, Advocate. =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent. The learned Single Judge has considered the matter on its own merit and allowed the writ petition holding that the State ought to have accepted the age of respondent as per a...
Awadhesh Ram and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.410 of 2012 Awadhesh Ram & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against three persons to have made assault with lathi, farsa, bricks and bamboo sticks for taking water from the hand-pump. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the F.I.R. the word Phata(bamboo stick) was used which has been interpolated as Farsa and the injury report suggests only one incise injury which has been treated to be grievous. It is further submitted that though for the occurrence of 22.07.2011 the F.I.R. was lodged on the same day, but it was transmitted to the learned Court below on 24.07.2011 which clouds the bona fide of the accusation. Considering the fact that there is general accusation of making assault against three persons bu...
Md. Taslim Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1043 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Taslim .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Panchayat Secretary is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he entered the name of Nusrat Saba in the draft voter list against the rule as Nusrat Saba never made application for making entry of her name. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is neither authorized to make any entry nor he made any entry or any verification with regard to the handwriting of the entry were made. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his ar...
- ‹ Prev
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- Next ›
- Last »