Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sajmullah Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42157 o1. Sajmullah Khan, S/o late Samsul Hoda Khan 2. Mustari Khatoon @ Mustari Begum, W/o late Samsul Hoda Khan 3. Razia Khatoon, D/o late Samsul Hoda Khan 4. Azimullah Khan, S/o late Samsul Hoda Khan All are resident of village Manpur, P.S. Khaira, District Saran at Chapra. ---------- Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar ---Opposite Party ******** 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction during course of the day as regard to the details of the case in paragraph 1 as well as prayer portion of the petition. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Protest cum Complaint Case No. C-568/2008 for offences under Sections 304(B), 201 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case instituted on the basis of complaint case 349/2006 being husband a...
Jeevan Raha Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36774 of 2011 Jeevan Raha, S/O-Jeetendra Bhushan Raha Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 17.07.2011 in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, one Vijay Kumar and Neeva Verma issued cheque of rupees six lacs in the name of the petitioner which was encashed by the petitioner through his account. Later on, the aforesaid cheque was again produced before different branches of the concerned bank and then it was detected that the second cheque was a fake document. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, the statements of Vijay Kumar and Neeva Verma have not been recorded and, as a matter of fact, they had issued cheque in question in favour of the petitioner w...
Ranju Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43224 o1. Ranju Devi, W/o Nageshwar Mahto, Resident of Village - Tahadiya, P.S.- Barahiya , District Lakhisarai. Versus 1. The State of Bihar -------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the mother of the boy who allegedly kidnapped the victim, let the petitioner, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 84 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Se...
District Rural Development Authority,nawadah Vs. Anish Kumar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1978 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11079 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 8752 of 2011 And Interlocutory Application No. 8753 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1978 of 2011 ====================================================== District Rural Development Authority, Nawadah .... .... Appellant/s Versus Anish Kumar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE13. 01-2012 Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1978 of 2011: Learned Advocate Mr. Nikesh Kumar states that he shall serve the respondent nos. 5 to 13 through the office of the learned Advocate General. Re. Interlocutory Application No. 8753 o...
Mohan Raut Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42144 of 2011 Mohan Raut, son of Yogi Raut ------- Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar --Opposite Party ******* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 85/2011 for offences under Sections 420/409 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case of alleged commission of illegality/irregularity in execution of beneficial scheme named as Indira Awas Yojana, but only as middle man. Submission is of false implication and no specific allegation is attributed against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount ea...
Pankaj Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43236 o1. Pankaj Singh, S/o Gita Singh Resident of Village - Rampur, P.S.- Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai.2. Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Gupta, S/o Muddu Singh, Resident of Village - Rampur, P.S.- Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai. Versus 1. The State of Bihar ------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State, Mr. Choubey Jawahar. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 353, 379 and 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in fact the truck loaded with gas cylinders dashed against the pregnant buffalow of the petitioner No. 2 on account of which she died and the gas cylinders were scattered when the petitioners went to the police station to claim maintenance instead they were foisted with the present case. It has further been submitted that no recovery was made from their possession and they have fair antecedents. Consideri...
Chamru Tanti and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1090 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chamru Tanti.2. Oila Devi.3. Madhuri Devi @ Madhuri Kumari.4. Shankar Tanti.5. Bam Bam Tanti. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(I) (X) (XI) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The specific accusation of causing injury is against Shankar Tatni. There is general accusation against others. The injury has been found to be simple. Though, there is accusation of abusing by calling caste name also. It is submitted that there is counter version of the occurrence also which clouds the accusation under SC/ST (Prevention of A...
Umesh Roy @ Umesh Prasad @ Umesh Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.858 of 2012 Umesh Roy @ Umesh Prasad @ Umesh Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 37(q) and 47(f) of the Excise Act. 200 litres of country made liquor and 500 Kg. of Jawa Mahua were seized. The Seizure memo reflects the name of five persons whereas the place of seizure has been assigned near Parsauna Mandir and animal fair. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that seizure was made on 29.07.2010, whereas the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned Court below on 12.08.2010. A statement has been made in para 8 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Umesh Roy @ Umesh Prasad @ Umesh Rai, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from toda...
Ajay Kumar Das Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.717 of 2010 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 4029 2010) Ajay Kumar Das Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 04. 13.01.2012 Learned counsel for the respondents is submitted that a counter affidavit has been field in the writ petition in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 18.04.2011. As writ petition has already been disposed of, we are of the opinion that as the writ petition itself stands disposed of, the counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents in the writ petition is treated to be filed in the present L.P.A. Accordingly, permission is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to make necessary correction in the Cause Title of the counter affidavit. Post this matter after two weeks, retaining its position. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.) P.K....
Shekhar Eqbal Khan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1026 of 2012 ====================================================== Shekhar Eqbal Khan, S/O Riaz Mohammad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 109, 110, 112, 115, 116, 117, 120(B), 406, 409, 420, 463, 468, 469, 471, 474, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The acquisition is that the petitioner along with others collected Rs.1,05000/- and Rs.1,50,000/- from the customers for processing loan fee but the loan was not sanctioned. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already deposited the amount alleged against him and considering the same others accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above na...
- ‹ Prev
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- Next ›
- Last »