Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gauri Shankar Giri Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39 of 2012 ====================================================== Gauri Shankar Giri .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================16. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 16.09.2011 in a case of misuse. The initial case was registered under Sections 307 and 326 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code when the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. but subsequently his name sprang up when the petitioner was granted bail. His bail bond was cancelled on 26.05.2004 but he surrendered on 16.09.2011. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned court below on each and every date. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10...
Raju Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1319 of 2012 Raju Singh & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation is of making assault and committing theft. It appears that injuries have been found to be simple and there is counter version of occurrence also. Considering the nature of accusation and counter version of occurrence also, let the petitioners, Raju Singh, Balu Singh and Bablu Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Koransarai P.S. Case No. 59 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar, 2 subject ...
Subhas Rajak Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35907 of 2011 Subhas Rajak Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner: Mr Raj Mukesh Sharma, Advocate For the State: Mr Braj Kishore, Prasad, A.P.P. --------- 03/ 16.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, name of this petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Marni Devi who happens to be wife of the deceased and the said Marni Devi has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court and apart from this, having similar allegation coaccused Anil Rajak has also been released on bail by this court vide order dated 6.9.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 28820/2011. Accordingly, petitioner, Subhas Rajak, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar IV, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Be...
Pradhan Kisku Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42254 of 2011 Pradhan Kisku, son of Happa Kisku , resident of village Binda Bari, P.S. Kadwa, District Katihar. ------ Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ---Opposite Party ***** 02. 16.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Kadwa P.S. Case No. 110/2011 for offences under Sections 341, 342, 325, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1- B)A/25/35 of Arms Act, is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of assaulting nephew of the informant by butt of a pistol when he intervened and rescue. Submission is of false implication and due to earlier dispute between the parties. Moreover, injury is of simple in nature and petitioner has no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be en...
Saumitra Gaur Vs. State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36816 of 2010 Saumitra Gaur Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Murli Dhar, APP ---------------------------------- 2. 16.01.2012 Issue notice to opposite party no. 2 under ordinary process as well as under registered cover with A/D, for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of two weeks, failing which the application as against the opposite party no.2 shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. In the meantime further proceedings against the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 246 (C)/2009 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, shall remain stayed. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned in connection with Complaint Case No. 246 (C)/2009 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. List this case after service of notice retaining its position. ( Vikash Jain, J.) Fahad....
Md. Mojahir @ Md. Mojahid and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42239 o1. Md. Mojahir @ Md. Mojahid son of Abdu Aziz 2. Sahidul, S/o Samidul Both are resident of village pagamberpur, P.S. Singhwara, District Darbhanga. ------ Petitioners. Versus The State oOf Bihar --Opposite Party ****** 02. 16.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 215/2011 for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 504, 509, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dain Act, are named accused in this case out of a lot respectively being a villager and husband of Up-Mukhiya with allegation of participating in torture and abuse of the informant blaming her a witch. Submission is of general and omnibus allegation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petit...
Ram Binod Mandal Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1197 of 2012 ====================================================== Ram Binod Mandal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP16. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 504, 307 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of making assault with farsa. The injury report reflects simple injury skin deep. There is counter versions of the occurrence also and the petitioners side has also received injury. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furni...
Satyendra Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.204 of 2012 Satyendra Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case of misuse. Petitioners bail bond was cancelled on 08.04.2002. Initially, the case was registered under Sections 324,341, 307,302/34 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act when the petitioner was granted bail. It appears that the petitioner is now languishing in custody since 30.03.2011. The petitioner undertakes to appear on each and every day during trial henceforth. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Patna, in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 15 of 1989, S.T. No. 115A/93. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of ...
Raja Ram Sisodia Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23414 of 2011 Raja Ram Sisodia, Son of Paras Nath Sisodia, R/o Village Bari Pahari, Magadh Colony, P.S. Sohsarai, District Nalanda, Biharsharif. -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 04/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon /xerox copy of the case diary. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 61 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight for a prayer of regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced of instant withdrawal. P...
Jailal Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1092 of 2012 ====================================================== Jailal Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of torture as the petitioner developed the illicit relationship with another woman after five years of the marriage. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the marriage was performed with the complainant 29 years ago and with the consent of the complainant since there was no issue, he performed second marriage about 24 years ago and now from second marriage he has major children. It is further submitted that the complainant initially took the share fro...
- ‹ Prev
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- Next ›
- Last »