Patna Court September 2011 Judgments
M/S. Kumar Construction Through Its Proprietor Suresh Kumar Vs. the St ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-09-2011
S.N. HUSSAIN, J. 1. Originally this writ petition was filed only against the State of Bihar and its authorities, namely respondent nos. 1 to 5 for the following reliefs:- (i) For directing the concerned respondent to produce the concerned letter by which technical bid of the petitioner has been cancelled in most arbitrary manner and having ulterior motive and quash the same because that cancellation was based on the sole ground that the petitioner has failed to give dates below his signatures, which were put on the tender documents, although entire documents were attested by the Gazetted officer. (ii) For further commanding the concerned respondents to consider the tender of the petitioner along with other bidder after opening of his financial bid and proceed in accordance with law for allotment of work in question. (iii) For passing such order or orders for which the petitioner is entitled under the law in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The short facts of this case is tha...
Tag this Judgment!Binay Prakash Vs. the State of Bihar and Others
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-09-2011
S.N. HUSSAIN, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of CERTIORARI for quashing order dated 03.11.2010 passed by Respondent no.2 and communicated to the petitioner by Respondent no.3 under his letter no.4641 dated 03.11.2010, whereby and where under Respondent no.2 has directed Respondent no.5 that because the petitioner did not complete the work before expiry of the time as mentioned in the agreement, therefore, the amount deducted from the bills of the petitioner for not completing the work within time would not be refunded to him. (ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to refund/pay the amount deducted from the bills of the petitioner with interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the ground of non-completion the work within time on the ground that the petitioner had completed the permitted work well withi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›