Patna Court May 2011 Judgments
Naresh Kumar Rastogi, Naresh Kumar Rastogi, Vs the State of Bihar. and ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgmentdated 08.05.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate,1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case No. 544 of 1990/Tr. No. 162 of 1995 by which it has acquitted the Respondents No. 2 for the charges framed under Section 420 IPC and 138 NI Act.2. On going through the judgment of acquittal, I do not find any perversity which would warrant interference in the acquittal of the Respondent No. 2. The appeal is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Ram Naresh Singh, Vs Chandrika Singh. and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgmentdated 13.04.1994 passed by the Judicial Magistrate,1st Class, Siwan in Complaint Case No. 64/85/Tr.No. 103/94 by which it has acquitted therespondents No. 1 to 3 for the charges framed underSections 323, 379 and 327 IPC.2. On going through the judgment of acquittal Ido not find any perversity or illegality and, therefore,decline to interfere in the same. The appeal isdismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs Mohammad Nizam ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. No one appears on behalf of the appellants.2. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgmentdated 18.04.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1stClass, Patna in Complaint Case No. 132 of 1988/Tr. No.198/94 by which it has acquitted the respondent for thecharges framed under Sections 406 and 409 IPC.3. On going through the judgment of acquittal, I findthat the three witnesses who have been examined on behalf of the complainant have not been able to establishthat the accused had misappropriated the jeep of the appellant. Moreover there were several contradictions in the statement of C.W. 1. Having regard to the fact that no perversity has been committed by the Trial Court in acquitting the sole Respondent, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The appeal is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Subedar Singh, and ors. Vs Mukurjee Singh, and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgmentdated 10.07.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1stClass, Bhabua in Complaint Case No. 53 of 1990/Tr.Case No. 160 of 1995 by which it has acquitted theRespondents No. 1 to 3 for the charges framed underSections 419/109, 468/105 and 467 IPC.2. On going through the judgment of acquittal I findthat the Trial Court has not committed any perversity inrecording the order of acquittal of the Respondents No. 3. In the result, the appeal is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Sabru Singh, Vs Umesh Singh, and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 12.04.1995 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Complaint Case No. 61/91/Tr. No. 129/95 by which it has acquitted the Respondent No. 1 for the charges framed under Section 304A IPC.2. On going through the judgment of acquittal I do not find any reason to disagree with the reasonings of the Trial Court. The appeal is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!Dashrath Singh, Vs the State of Bihar. and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-02-2011
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 25.07.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 335(C)/1991/Tr. No. 179/95 by which it has acquitted the Respondent No. 2 for the charges framed under Section 420 IPC.2. On going through the judgment of acquittal I do not find any perversity or illegality and, therefore, decline to interfere in the same. The appeal is dismissed....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›