Skip to content

Patna Court November 2009 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 05 2009

Tijan Musahar @ Jitan Musahar Son of Moti Musahar and ors. Vs. the Sta ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-05-2009

Sheema Ali Khan, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 20.01.2009 by which their application under Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected. Accordingly, the bail bohds filed on behalf of the petitioners were cancelled and notices were issued to the bailors in this case.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he was regularly appearing in this case and on an earlier occasion, the application under Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was allowed and thereafter the petitioners again filed his haziri and were appearing in this case.4. The petitioners have filed an application under Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying therein to excuse them from appearing in the Court on 20.01.2009. Counsel challenges the order on the ground that not only the Court below rejected the application filed under Section 317 of the Code of Crim...


Nov 04 2009

D. Pradeep Kishan @ D. Pradeep, Son of Late Kishan Gopal Dongargaonkar ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-04-2009

Sheema Ali Khan, J.1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 23.04.2008 by which the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur has taken cognizance of the offences committed under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code in Complaint Case No. 951C of 2007.2. Ravi Kishan Dongargaonkar (the complainant) has filed a complaint petition challenging the Will executed by his father Late Kishan Gopal Dongargaonkar by alleging that it was obtained by fraud. It would be relevant to quote the genealogical table from the complaint petition.Kishan Gopal Dongargaonkar(died on 23.03.2006)Nalini (wife)-died on 29.03.1989|----------------------------------------------------- | || || |Daughter - 2 Son - 3| |-------------------------------------------------------| | | | | |Nandini Ramesh (59 yrs) Jyoti Anant (56 yrs) |||||-------------------------------------------------------| | || | |Ravi Kishan Chandu Kishan Pradeep Kishan (54 years) (43 years) (43 years)Partner in RA- (D...


Nov 03 2009

Dr. Manoj Kumar Sinha Son of Sri Tapeshwari Prasad Maltiyar and Dr. Sa ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-03-2009

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and Women Development Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Corporation.2. Petitioners were applicant for appointment on the post of District Project Manager in the Corporation, pursuant to advertisement (Annexure-1) close perusal whereof would indicate that 38 vacancies were notified for appointment and the applicants were called upon to apply giving detailed CV Petitioners having submitted their CV were called to appear in the written test as also interview. It is submitted that out of total 38 vacancies 28 appointments have been made so far. 10 vacancies are yet to be filled up. Out of the 10 remaining vacancies 3 are general category vacancy to which the petitioners belong. It is submitted on their behalf that Advertisement (Annexure-1) did not indicate the manner of selection as only bio-data CV was called for from the applicants later petitioners and other applicants were made to appear in a written test a...


Nov 03 2009

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Prasad Son of Sri Chandramauleshwar Prasad Sinha V ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-03-2009

Mandhata Singh, J.1. This revision application has been filed against order dated 5th September, 1995 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Kotwali P.S. Case No. 55 of 1992, by which he has dismissed the petition for discharge of the petitioner from the said case.2. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act. Petitioner's capacity is of Assistant Manager of Hotel Sheohar Sadan situated at Fraser Road, Patna. Real fact was that two Lankan foreigners had come to petitioner's hotel on 07.5.1991 and left on 08.5.1991. Similarly another Jarman foreigner had come to his hotel on 14.7.1991 and left on 16.7.1991. Submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was found guilty for not furnishing Form-C which is requirement of Registration of Foreigners Act. Further according to the learned Counsel that Section 14 of the Foreigners Act applies for violation of any of the terms or provision of Foreigners Ac...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial