Patna Court September 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bihar Rajya Koshagar Avam Lekha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-04-2006
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.1. Both these writ petitions involve common issues and with the consent of the parties have, therefore, been heard together and are being disposed of by a common order.2. Heard Dr. Sadanand Jha, Sr. counsel for the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 3890/06, Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, learned Counsel in the other case and learned J.C. to G.P. VIII.3. The petitioners seek quashing of the decision of the State Government in the Finance Department contained in Letter No. 1437 F (2) dated 8.3.2006 (Annexura-1) by which the Collectors have been directed to absorb the petitioners by appointing them as deputationists in the Treasuries from the Boards/Corporations in the Joint Cadre of L.D. Clerks of the Collectorate in the scale of pay of Rs. 3050-4590/- after relaxing maximum age limit. The petitioners further seek quashing of the Resolution contained in Memo No. 1096 dated 22.2.2006 by which the cadre of the employees in the Treasuries of the State has been amalgamated with t...
Raj Kishore Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
1. Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances, as well as, the grounds mentioned in the delay condonation application, we are satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the period of limitation. Therefore, the application for condonation of delay shall stand allowed and the delay of 40 days in filing this Letters Patent Appeal shall stand condoned.2. Rule is made absolute. No costs.3. Upon joint request of learned Counsels appearing for the parties, this matter has been taken up for final hearing today itself as processual part is waived by the other side.4. We have heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties. We have considered the factual matrix. We have, also, seen small order of the learned Single Judge, recorded, on 16.5.2005, in C.W.J.C. No. 5274 of 2004.5. The following aspects have emerged from the record which are not disputed at all:(i) That the appellant- original writ petitioner who was working as a Nazir in Siswan Block Office...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›