Patna Court June 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sangeeta Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-19-2006
Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.1. The three petitioners, who had been appointed as Anganbari Sevika and Sahaikas in Pakhanaha Dumaria Gram Panchayat, have come to this Court for quashing of the letter dated 7.1.2006 issued under the signature of the District welfare Officer west Champaran, Bettiah whereby a direction has been given to the Child Developments Project officer, Bairia, West Champaran (Respondent No. 6) to constitute an Aamsabha and to appoint Anganbari Sevika and Sahayikas in place of the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners are related to Mukhiya, Up-Mukhiya and Peon of a high school respectively.2. Petitioner No. 1 was appointed as Anganbari Sevika and petitioner No. 2 and 3 were appointed as Anganbari Sahayikas in the aforesaid Grampanchayat on 23.12.2003, 22.12.2003 and 15.6.2004 respectively.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that they had been appointed after following all the due processes at a time, when in terms of the guidelines in existence there i...
Mahadeo Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-15-2006
J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. Upon the matter being called out, learned Counsels for the parties are present and upon a joint request the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought a direction against the respondents to make payment of arrears of salary of the petitioner for the work done during the period from May, 1995 to November, 1998 which comes to a total amount of Rs. l,78,693/-, which is elaborately stated in annexure 1 to the petition, with interest and, also, the arrears of difference of salary of Rs. 89,533/- as stated, in annexure 2.3. Learned Counsels for the parties are heard and the factual profile is examined. Counter affidavit is, also, considered.4. The following facts have emerged undisputedly in this petition which may be highlighted at this juncture:(1) The petitioner was serving under Bihar Water Development Corporation(Corporation).(2) In the year 1998 his services were taken over by Tu...
Mundrika Kumari and ors. Vs. B.N. Mandal University and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-14-2006
J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. In this petition, the petitioners have sought for a direction against respondent No. 1, B.N. Mandal University (In short the 'University'), for recognition of the B.Ed. degree issued to them, by revoking the cancellation order of the University for such degrees on the ground that the affiliation of the College, namely, Muslim Minority Ahmadia B.Ed. College, Millat Nagar, Rampara, Katihar, (In short the 'College') was cancelled pursuant to the report of the vigilance Inquiry held in 1999, contending that the examinations were taken and degrees were awarded prior to the cancellation of the affiliation of the College.2. There is no dispute about the fact that a vigilance inquiry came to be conducted in respect of the allegations of irregularities and illegalities for the affiliation of the college, Muslim Minority Ahmadia B.Ed. College'. The report of the vigilance inquiry was necessitated on account of certain irregularities and Illegalities in running the College, as...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›