Skip to content

Patna Court May 2005 Judgments

May 03 2005

Salim Lari and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-03-2005

V.N. Sinha, J. 1. During the pendency of this writ application, Smt. Sheela Devi has been allotted the shop in question by the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi under Letter No. 95 dated 2.2.2005, Annexure-14 and thereafter I.A. No. 613 of 2005 was filed to implead her as party Respondent in this writ application. Let Smt, Sheela Devi, wife of Shankar Sah be impleaded as party Respondent No. 6.2. Shri Shailesh Kumar Sharma appears on her behalf and for that purpose he has already filed vakalatnama.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and the private Respondent No. 6The two petitioners have assailed the directions of the Collector, Sitamarhi contained in his Letter No. 1506 dated 26.10.2004, Annexure-1, whereunder he has instructed the Circle Officer, Riga to lodge a First Information Report against the two petitioners and thereafter to take forcible possession of the shop in question from them.3. Petitioners assail the aforesaid instructions on the ground that the said instr...

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2005

Kumar Kant Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-02-2005

Reported in: 2005(2)BLJR1405

1. The petitioners in the present writ application question the orders of their reversion dated 18.11.2002 with retrospective effect, as contained at Annexure-1. They also challenge the subsequent order dated 2.1.2002, at Annexure-2 after a representation made by the petitioners giving effect to the reversion prospectively.2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the present application would be that petitioner No. 1 was appointed as a Junior Research Assistant by the Superintending Engineer with the Work-charged Establishment of the Irrigation Department on 23.12.1974. The other petitioners are stated to have been similarly appointed between April 1975 to November, 1977. Pursuant to the constitution of a selection committee and the recommendation of the names of the petitioners, the Superintending Engineer sought approval for promotion of the petitioners in the work-charged. Establishment as Research Assistants. On 30.8.978 the Chief Engineer approved the promotions of the petitione...

Tag this Judgment!

  • Next ›


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial