Patna Court October 2005 Judgments

Sunil Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Respondents.2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the detention order, bearing Letter No. 17 dated 13-1-2005, Annexure-1 to this application, passed by the District Magistrate, Begusarai, whereunder resorting to the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Bihar Control of Crime Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), petitioner has been detained in Begusarai District Jail. He is further aggrieved by the grounds of detention as contained in order bearing No. 24 dated 15-1-2005, Annexure-2 to this application issued by the aforesaid detaining authority. He is even aggrieved by the order of the State Government as communicated to him by the Deputy Secretary to the Government in the Home (Police) Department, bearing No. 2077 dated 15-3-2005, Annexure-1/3, whereunder State Government has been pleased to confirm the aforesaid detention of the petitioner for a period of one year from the date of issue of t...

Shambhu Prasad Singh Vs. the Bihar State Co-operative Land Development ...

Court: Patna

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. This application has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo dated 4.11.1999 (Annexure-1), whereby the punishment inflicted on the petitioner earlier by order dated 30.11.1991 has been revived.2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that by order as contained in memo dated 30.11.1991 (Annexure-7) the petitioner was visited with the penalty of reversion from the post of Assistant in the selection grade to that of Assistant in the basic grade with effect from 1.12.1991. By the said order it was further directed that the petitioner shall not be entitled for any other allowance other than the subsistence allowance. Petitioner challenged the said order by filing CWJC No. 1083 of 1992 Shambhu Prasad Singh v. Bihar State Co-operative Land Development Bank Limited and Ors.), before this Court. By order dated 7.8.1998 this Court quashed the aforesaid order with the following direction :-The case was heard for sometime yesterday. In...

Krishna Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna

Reported in: (2006)(1)SLJ201CAT

1. The applicant is widow of Late Man Mohan Dey who was appointed as casual labourer in the Postal Department on 04.04.1983 and, having worked as such continuously, he was granted temporary status w.e.f.29.11.1989 but, as the ill fate would have it, he died in harness on 11.02.1999, still working under temporary status. There is no dispute about the aforesaid facts.2. The applicant claims that thereafter the respondents sent her form under Rule 54(12) of the CCS (Pension) Rules for being filled up which fact however has been denied in the written statement. The claim of the applicant was that she was paid neither gratuity, nor family pension despite requests rather, without paying her anything, areceipt for Rs. 15,000 was taken, which the respondents say was taken for payment of CGEIS which amount was paid.Judgment in O.A. 339 of 2004 has been annexed at Annexure-A/5 granting similar relief to another similarly situated applicant, which fact is admitted in the written statement.3. The...