Patna Court May 2004 Judgments
Bihar State Food Corporation and Others Vs. Food Supply and Commerce D ...
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: May-07-2004
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. O.P. is the appellant which has preferred the appeal against the order dated 6.8.2003 passed by District Forum, Patna in Case No. 204/2000 whereby and whereunder the O.P. No. 1 (Corporation) has been directed to make payment to the complainant of the share amount of the employers contribution to E.P.E. from the date of deputation, i.e., 6.8.1977 till the date of his retirement, i.e., 30.4.1998 with interest as applicable. The District Forum also awarded a cost of Rs. 10,000/- as compensation and Rs. 1,000/- as litigation cost. 2. The brief fact of the case is that complainant was appointed as laboratory attendant in the department of Food, Supply and Commerce, Government of Bihar (hereinafter referred to department) on 1.10.1958 and was confirmed on this post since 20.4.1972. He was posted in the office of the District Manager-O.P. No. 4 as Godown Operator since 6.8.1977 to the date of retirement, i.e., 30.4.1998. He wrote several letters to the Departme...
Tag this Judgment!Pramod Singh Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-06-2004
Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner is aggrieved by the denial of payment of Mediclaim pursuant to Mediclaim Insurance Policy bearing No. 48 of the year 2003 for the period 14.5.2002 to 13.5.2003 issued by the Respondent-Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vide Annexure-1.2. In short, the relevant facts are that on 14.5.2002 petitioner took a Mediclaim policy from Branch office of the Respondent-Company situated at Sudama Palace, Kankarbagh, Patna, for the sum of Rs. two lacs insured for self and Rs. fifty thousand for his wife, namely, Smt. Manju Singh after deposit of Rs. 4915/-towards premium service charge and stamp duty. The Insurance Company issued certificate to the petitioner, a photostat copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-1. The petitioner, who is a practising Advocate, claims that he was quite alright and physically fit to undertake his daily professional work and, in fact, attended the Court till 22nd May, 2002. However, he desired to get himself t...
Tag this Judgment!Laxmi Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-06-2004
Narayan Roy, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. This writ application was filed substantially for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment by way of promotion to the post of enforcement Sub-Inspector-in preference to respondent Nos. 6 to 15, who have been appointed by way of promotion to the post of Enforcement Sub-Inspectors. A prayer has also been made to quash the orders of appointment of respondent Nos. 6 to 15 as they were juniors to the petitioner as shown in joint and final gradation list of clerks of mofussil subordinate office of the Transport Department, published in the year 1993.3. During the pendency of this writ application, an amendment application has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging Annexure A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State, whereby and whereunder the representation filed by the petitioner pursuant to order passed by this Court in CWJC No. 14...
Tag this Judgment!L.i.C. and Another Vs. Bachhi Devi
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: May-05-2004
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. O.P.-L.I.C. is the appellant which has preferred the appeal against the order dated 10.7.1997 passed by District Forum, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 190/1993 whereby and whereunder the District Forum has allowed the complainants claim and directed the L.I.C. to pay a sum of Rs. 20,000/- together with interest @ 13% per annum from the date of institution of the case (23.9.1993) till the date of payment and further ordered to pay Rs. 1,000/- as compensation and Rs. 500/- as litigation cost. 2. The brief fact of the case is that policy holder late Mohan Prasad Singh died on 8.1.1972 leaving behind the complainant his wife and nominee of the policy. He had a policy dated 20.12.1967 for Rs. 20,000/- only for which the premium were paid regularly. After his death on 8.1.1972 she sent several letters and reminders to the L.I.C. for the amount of policy but she was not paid any amount. The last was dated 30.8.1993. Thereafter she filed the case before the District...
Tag this Judgment!Telephones and Another Vs. Vijay Kumar
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: May-03-2004
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. This appeal has been heard ex parte as the respondent did not appear in spite of the notice. O.P.-appellant has preferred the appeal against the order dated 11.6.2003 passed by District Forum, Motihari in Complaint Case No. 32/2002 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been directed to remove the cable fault of the complainant and not to charge rental for the period the telephone line remained out of order and further allowed Rs. 1,000/- as compensation for deficiency on the part of the appellant. 2. The brief fact of the case is that complainant is a subscriber of Telephone No. 27690 at Motihari. This phone remained non-functional for many dates and after repeated requests the defects were not removed permanently. There were no telephone dues against him. He has paid the current and the arrears of the telephone bills but in spite of that his line was disconnected and when he produced the relevant papers showing the payment he was directed to deposit ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›