Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. Complainant is the appellant who has preferred the appeal against the order dated 17.6.2003 passed in Complaint Case No. 26/2002 by District Forum, Khagaria whereby and whereunder dismissed the complaint petition. 2. The brief fact of the case is that complainant filed the case before the District Forum against O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 the two doctors alleging therein that O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 have given wrong pathological report and treated him wrongly which deteriorated in his ailment. On the basis of this allegation complainant claimed Rs. 1,21,000/- as compensation against both the O.Ps. 3. The allegation of the complainant was that on 2.2.2003 he was feeling headache and pain hence he went to the private clinic of Dr. S.K. Das at Khagaria (O.P. No. 1) for his treatment who started his treatment and supplied some medicine from his clinic and also advised him for some pathological test and sent him for those tests to O.P. No. 2 who had Bhola Patho Clinic at Kha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
M.L. Visa, J.1. By this election petition filed under Sections 80, 80A and 81 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), Anand Mohan, election petitioner has challenged the election of returned candidate Md. Anwarul Haque, respondent No. 1, who has been declared elected from 12, Sheohar Parliamentary Constituency in the mid-term Parliamentary Election, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Election in question') held on 3.10.1999 and has prayed for setting aside the election of respondent No. 1, recounting of votes and on the basis of said counting declaring the petitioner as returned candidate in the election in question.2. The case of petitioner, in short, is that the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi-cum-Returning Officer of 12, Sheohar Parliamentary Constituency issued Notification on 7.9.1999 for mid-term Election of Parliament,'1999 in 12, Sheohar Parliamentary Constituency as per the following programme :--(i) Last date for filing of nominat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Narayan Roy, J.1.Heard counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the petitioners seek direction upon the respondents to consider their cases for promotion from the post of Havildar to Civil Jamadar, now known as Reserve Sub-Inspector (Training) with effect from due date and consequential benefit. 3. Precisely, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners were outlisted in the year 1990 by the Central Selection Board and thereafter the Central Selection Board by a subsequent meeting considered the cases of others and the cases of the petitioners were bypassed, as their service books were not made available to the committee. 4. From the materials on record, it appears that the petitioners' cases were not considered on account of non-availability of the service books. 5. It appears to be a case of laches on the part of the respondent authorities and, in that view of the matter, the authorities concerned may be directed to fix a date of selection comm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. Both the appeals have been heard together as they arise out of the common order. This order shall govern both the appeals. 2. Appeal No. 103/203 has been preferred by O.P.-appellant (Bihar State Electricity Board hereinafter referred to as Board) against the order dated 10.2.2003 passed by District Forum, Purnea in Complaint Case No. 64/2002 whereby and whereunder the Forum directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 2,287/- to the respondent-complainant as compensation and litigation cost and further directed to adjust this amount in the electric bill of the month of September, 2002. The Forum also directed that this amount shall be realised from the salary of the bill clerk. 3. Appeal No. 202/2003 has been preferred by the complainant-appellant against the above impugned order with a prayer to set aside the impugned order (10.2.2003). 4. The brief fact of the case is that complainant Bhola Pandey is a consumer of the Board. He filed the case before the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
1. These matters have taken the attention of the Court for virtually the entire pre-lunch session. The Court has given its consideration to hear counsel for all parties. Clearly, no one can deny that the matter is one of public planning and a public issue. Not just recruitment of teachers is at stake, these matters concern the future of children, eradication of illiteracy and preventing a continuing damaging situation, which the State of Bihar faces of a generation which has grown up as illiterates. This is not the Court's certificate but now the Government of India certifies that since 1991 time has stood still. Any development plan for primary education which was to be executed remains unexecuted. Children for the last more than a decade have grown up without provision for education, Bihar has manufactured a generation of illiterates. Absence of any planning is now a matter of record.2. The Court virtually stopped all work for these cases because the matter concerns the welfare of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 11.10.2002 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Munger in Arms Appeal No. 6/2001-2002 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of the Licensing Authority revoking the licence has been, dismissed for default. Further prayer made by the petitioner is to quash the order dated 31.1.2003 (Annexure-7) whereby the application filed for restoration of the aforesaid appeal, has been dismissed.2. Short facts giving rise to the present application are that the petitioner held licence bearing No. 12 of 1996 for a non-prohibited bore arms. After the grant of the licence, he purchased the rifle on 7.9.1998. A proceeding for revocation of the licence was initiated against the petitioner and the Licensing Authority cancelled his licence. Against the said order, he preferred appeal before the Commissioner which was registered as Arms Appeal No. 6 of 2001, 2002 in which on 6.9.2002,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. Appeal No. 500/1997 and Revision No. 24/1998 both have been heard together as they arise out of the common order. The appeal has been preferred by the O.P. against the order dated 16.5.1997 passed by District Forum, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 134/1996 whereby and whereunder directed the appellant to pay the salary of 18 months amounting to Rs. 25,650/-, towards provident fund Rs. 10,070/- and further to pay salary @ Rs. 1,425/- per month from the month of October, 1995 to March, 1996 amounting to Rs. 8,505/-. Thus, in all allowed a claim of Rs. 44,225/- besides interest @ 12% from the date of institution of the complaint against the appellant and also allowed compensation to the tune of Rs. 500/- only. 2. The brief fact of the case is that complainant is an employee of O.P. whose Head Office is at Patna and Branch Office at Gaya. He was appointed by the O.P. and his job was goods checking. He has been regularly transferred from one place to another in th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
D.P.S. Choudhary, President: 1. This appeal has been heard ex parte preferred by O.P. (Special Officer, Sasaram Municipality) against the order dated 14.12.1995 whereby and whereunder the appellant was directed to pay compensation of Rs. 3,000/- and Rs. 1,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. The brief fact of the case is that he has a Sattu shop but the road in front of his shop is not being cleaned by the Municipality regularly which is filled up with mud, dirty water and nuisance has been created in the locality which has resulted into loss of his business as the customers do not approach his shop. The Nala in front of his shop has not been cleaned since long in spite of several requests to the authorities. 3. On the basis of the allegation complainant filed the case and claimed compensation from the appellant. 4. The appellant (Municipality) appeared and filed written statement stating therein that the allegation of the complainant is false and fabricated. There was no deficiency in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
S.N. Jha, J.1. The dispute in this case relates to pay scale on Untrained Post Graduate + 2 Lecturers in Nationalised Secondary Schools and the question for consideration is whether they are entitled to the same scale as their trained counterparts.2. The case of the petitioners supported by the intervenes is that in the advertisement, being Advt. No. 1/87, inviting applications for the post of + 2 Lecturers in Secondary Schools, the pay scale of the post was mentioned as Rs. 940-1660/- and they are entitled to the corresponding replacement scale after the pay revision. After the Fifth Pay Revision, by resolution No. 6021 dated 18.12.1988, the existing scale of Rs. 940-1660/- was replaced by the scale of Rs. 1640-2900/-with effect from 1.1.1986. However, by Government order dated 25.8.1990 scale of Rs. 2000-3500/- was allowed for Lecturers in+ 2 Government Schools giving rise to anomaly of pay of + 2 Lecturers in the Government Schools and nationalised schools. In the circumstances, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Narayan Roy, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties and considered the I.A. applications filed on behalf of the petitioner and also the counter affidavits filed on behalf of the State.2. This case depicts sorrow state of affairs. The petitioner, who is said to be an Assistant Engineer in the Minor Irrigation Department, is moving here and there without proper posting since 8th July, 1998 and even without payment of salary.3. The petitioner submitted his charge report before the Executive Engineer, Siwan Division, with effect from 7.7.1998, but the same was not accepted and thereafter this Court vide order dated 30th June, 1999 disposed of the interlocutory application and the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Siwan Division, was, accordingly, directed to countersign the charge report effective from 7.7.1998 enabling the petitioner to joint new place of posting. It was further directed that after the counter-signature is made, the petitioner shall joint the new place of posting forthw...
Tag this Judgment!