Patna Court December 2003 Judgments
Nav Bharat Link ChaIn Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bi ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In this writ petition, the prayer is for quashing of the certificate, contained in Annexure-6, and the certificate proceedings arising therefrom in Certificate Case No. BICICO/131 of 2002 initiated for recovery of BICICO loan.2. Petitioner No. 1 is the borrower Company, which took two term loans from the Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (in short 'BICICO'). The first term loan was taken in the year 1983 under the Standard Loan Agreement executed between the parties on 15-11-1983, a photocopy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-7. In Clause 10.5 of the Agreement, the borrower Company agreed that it would be open to the BICICO to recover its due or dues either by way of filing the certificate case under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act or by way of filing suit or suits.3. The borrower Company took another loan from the BICICO in the year 1987, which was a term loan under the Equipment Finance Scheme. The agreement for the sa...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesh Prasad Srivastava Vs. Punjab National Bank Through Its Chairman ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Nagendra Rai, J. 1. The petitioners of the four writ petitions, namely, CWJC Nos. 4538, 4547, 4554 and 4621, all of 2003, are the employees of the Canara Bank, whereas, the petitioner of CWJC No. 797/02 is an employee of the Punjab National Bank..2. The question involved in all the cases is as to whether the qualification of 'Sahityalankar' with English from Hindi Vidyapeeth Deoghar, is equivalent to Bachelor Degree/Diploma or certificate for the purposes of giving promotion, increment etc. in the service.3. All the writ petitions were placed before a learned Single Judge, who, by order dated 15.9.2003, has referred the matter for authoritative decision by a Division Bench in view of the fact that the said question has wide-ranging effect. That is how the matter has been placed before us for decision.4. The petitioners of the last four writ petitions are the employees of Canara Bank. They were appointed on daily wages and, thereafter, were appointed as permanent Sub-Staff on differe...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Laxmi Prasad and Ajay Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-01-2003
Radha Mohan Prasad, J. 1. In all these three writ petitions the dispute is common with respect to retail outlet Dealership of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at Daudnagar in the District of Aurangabad, Bihar, pursuant to the advertisement dated 1-9-2000, contained in Annexure-1. Pursuant to the aforementioned advertisement, petitioners of all the three writ petitions filed their application and participated in the interview on 10/11-1-2002. It is alleged that the date of said interview was extended to 28-1 -2002 for interview of Bijay Kumar Sharma and Upendra Sharma. On 15-1-2002 Jayant Kumar Thakur (Respondent No. 6 in first writ petition i.e., C.W.J.C. No. 1613 of 2003) made a complaint to Minister, Petroleum and Natural Gas regarding extension of date. However, Dealer Selection Board, hereinafter referred to as 'the Selection Board', published the names of shortlisted candidate in which the name of petitioner of 3rd writ petition (C.W.J.C. No. 7161 of 2003) was included at serial No. ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›