Patna Court December 2002 Judgments
Domi Modi and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
S.N. Pathak, J. 1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 23-2-2001, passed by the Sessions Judge, Munger at Camp Court, Jamui, in Cr. Appeal No. 8/190 of 2000 confirming the order of conviction rendered by the trial Court in its judgment dated 4-12-2000 in G.R. Case No. 1218 of 1995 Tr. No. 514 of 2000. All therevisionists were convicted under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo R.T. for one year each by the trial Court which was reduced to six months by the appellate Court. The revisionists were further convicted under Sections 341 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and they were sentenced to undergo R.I. for one month and six months respectively which was kept intact by the appellate Court. 2. It has been submitted by the revisionists lawyer that the alleged occurrence took plea on a row over cutting of Palas tree allegedly standing over the informant's school premises. The revisionists were further claiming the aforesaid land as...
Tag this Judgment!Safida Mian @ Md. Safida Mian and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
S.N. Pathak, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 27-2-2001, passed by the Sessions Judge, Samastipur, in Cr. Appeal No. 82 of 2000 confirming the order of conviction recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rosera, in C.R. Case No. 289 of 1994 Tr. No. 100 of 2000. All the revisionists were convicted under Sections 323 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months on each count. The revisionists No. 1 namely Safida Mian was further convicted under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code and was further sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months. All the sentences were to run concurrently.2. This revision was admitted on the point of sentence only and it has been submitted by the revisionists lawyer that the revisionists remained in custody for near about one month after dismissal of the appeal by the appellate Court and before release from this Court by order dated 22-6-2001. However, they are entitled to benefit of Section 3...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›