Patna Court November 2002 Judgments
Ram Kumar Mukhiya Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-15-2002
Aftab Alam, J. 1. The single petitioner Ram Kumar Mukhiya and respondent No. 6 Paltan Mukhiya seem to be engaged in a bitter fight over the settlement and control of the many Government jalkars in two blocks in the District of Darbhanga. The fight for the control of the Jalkars is manifested before the departmental authorities and the Courts in a controversy over an order passed by the Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (A.R.C.S.) by which he recalled his earlier order approving the division of a self sufficient co-operative society and cancelled the certificate of registration of the two societies, resulting from the division of the erstwhile society. 2. The relevant facts may be stated as follows ; A co-operative society under the name of Kusheshwarasthan Fishermens' Co-operative Society was registered in the year 1963 under the provisions of the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935. The area of operation of the Society was the whole of the undivided Kusheshwarasthan block....
Tag this Judgment!Vishnu Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-15-2002
P.K. Deb, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the above mentioned petitioner challenging the letter written by the Cane Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to the Cane Commissioner, Bihar on 27-10-1998 putting some restrictions on the functioning of the different sugar factories situated within the State of Bihar (Annexure-8) and also the direction given by the Superintendent of Police, Kushi Nagar within the State of U.P, dated 2-11-1998 to the Officer Incharges of different police station of the disputed areas in respect of the areas covered in this writ petition situated within the State of Bihar (Annexure-9) and also some other developments which had accrued during the pendency of this writ petition.2. To appreciate the crux of dispute in this writ petition some factual aspects and the history behind it requires to be reiterated.The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act having its sugar factory at Harakhua situated within the district of Goaplganj in t...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs. Gulab Devi
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Nov-15-2002
D.P.S.Choudhary, President: 1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-respondent (an official of the P.N.B. Branch Office, Madhubani), against the order dated 5.11.1998 passed by the District Forum, Madhubani in Consumer Case No. 128/1998. The brief fact of the case is that the respondent-complainant filed a complaint case before the District Forum, Madhubani on 1.9.1998 against the appellant and other officials of the P.N.B. vide Consumer Case No. 128/1998. The contention of the complainant was that she was widow of late Krishnadeo Singh, a freedom fighter. During the pendency of his claim for pension he died on 14.8.1997 whereafter the respondent-complainant was substituted in the place of her husband. After due verification by Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Finance, Government of India, the claim of freedom fighters pension was cleared and Ministry of Finance, Government of India sent all the documents including P.P.O. No. MHAFF 980/2003 dated 17.4.1998 to the app...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Chandra Singh Vs. the Director, Bihar Hindi Granth Academy and ors ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-14-2002
S.N. Jha, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 520 dated 12.8.2000 of the Director, Bihar Hindi Granth Academy, by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service, and for other consequential and incidental reliefs.2. The case of the petitioner, an Administrative Officer of the Bihar Hindi Granth Academy (in short, 'the Academy'), is that he was appointed on the post of Clerk in the Academy on 2.3.71 and in course of time promoted as Administrative Officer on 26.7.88. According to the petitioner, the appointing authority is the Executive Committee of the Academy and the Director simply carries out the decision of the Executive committee and the Chairman. However on 7.12.93 he was placed under suspension by the Director. The above suspension order was passed in view of a criminal case being Case. No. CA 364/94. The petitioner challenged the continuance of suspension before this Court in CWJC No. 9526/98, Vide order dated 8.2.99 this C...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›