Patna Court June 2000 Judgments
Lucky Medicine Distributors and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-30-2000
S.K. Chattopadhaya, J.1. The entire criminal prosecution initiated against the petitioners including the order talcing cognizance of the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the Penal Code are sotight to be quashed in this application as prayed for by the petitioners.2. The complainant-company is manufacturer of medicine and allied products and also marketing the same. It is alleged in the complaint petition that it sold medicine worth Rs. 11 lakh 74 thousand and odd to the petitioners on assurance that the petitioners would make payment through cheque. Detail of invoices, by which medicines were sold as well as the amount, has been given in the complaint-petition. On 11.1.96, 17.1.96 and 6.2.96, three cheques were issued by the petitioners for the said amount but all the cheques were dishonoured by the Bank concerned due to insufficiency of amount in the account of the petitioners. On 23.2.96, the company informed the petitioners regarding such dishonoured of cheques and requested f...
Tag this Judgment!Rambha Devi Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-29-2000
D.N. Prasad, J.1. This application has filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for release of the truck No. BPO 5925 which has been seized in connection with Bermo PS Case No. 141/1997 which was registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.2. The short facts giving rise to this application that the Informant along with his partner/petitioner (Rambha Devi) had purchased truck No. BPO 5925 for the total value of Rs. 2,70,000/- out of which the Informant paid a sum of Rs. 2,04,000/- and the rest amount was paid by the petitioner Rambha Devi on 19.11.1996 and the truck started plying under the care of the husband of the petitioner and the informant. It is further alleged in the FIR that on 20.11.1996 the petitioner and her husband came at the residence of the informant and decided that the vehicle will henceforth ply at Bokaro and they would give Rs. 2,04,000/- in 18 monthly instalments and for which an agreement was also entered. It is also alleg...
Tag this Judgment!Steel Authority of India Ltd., Bokaro Vs. Ispat Engineering and Foundr ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-29-2000
Sudhir Kumar Katriar, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29-4-1995, and the consequent decree, passed by Mr. R.B. Rai, Subordinate Judge 1st. Bokaro at Chas, in Title (Arbitration) Suit No. 20/94 (Ispat Engineering and Foundry Works v. Steel Authority of India Ltd,), whereby he has made the award of the umpire dated 25-4-1994, a rule of the Court. 2. The defendant is the appellant. Forthe purpose of disposal of the present appeal, we shall go by the description of the parties before the Court below. The defendant is a public sector undertaking of the Government of India, entire shares of which are held by the President of India or his official nominees. It has set up a steel plant at Bokciro Steel City, district Bokaro, in the State of Bihar. The defendant had published a tender notice bearing No. K-174/154 on 13-5-1985, for manufacture and supply of slag notches as per the specified drawing. Various tenders were submitted, the plaintiffs tender was accepted an...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Mukund Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
1. The applicants 12 in number are Assistant Divisional Medical Officers of Eastern Railway (ADMO) posted in different Divisions of the Eastern Railway. They have prayed for the following reliefs : (i) For a direction to the respondents to determine the seniority of the applicants after taking into consideration their entire service including their initial ad-hoc period which was subsequently regularised through the Union Public Service Commission; (ii) The Respondents may be directed to give promotion to the applicants with the senior scale of Divisional Medical Officers retrospectively from the date (s) of their ad /hoc/temporary joining on the post of Assistant Medical Officer (Grade-II); and 2. The applicants were appointed as Assistant Medical Officer (Grade-II) after being selected through the process of written examination followed by oral test conducted by a selection committee consisting of three Heads of Department viz; Chief Medical Officer, Chief Personnel Officer and a Me...
Tag this Judgment!Patna Municipal Corporation Vs. Kalawati Devi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
P.K. Sinha, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Patna Municipal Corporation through its Administrator which impugns order dated 15.5.99 recorded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge VII, Patna) in Claim Case No. 124 of 1997 by which, under the provision of Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Patna Municipal Corporation has been directed to pay interim compensation of Rs. 50,000 to the claimants.2. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 6 and 7 are present and with their consent, this appeal is being disposed of at this stage. It was submitted that the other two respondents did not appear even in the lower court.3. The facts in short are that on 27.5.98 respondent No. 6, Central Coal Field Limited, which was the owner of offending vehicle, had filed an application that Mahesh Choudhary, a hawker had died in accident on 27.7.97 in the town of Patna. The aforesaid vehicle was earlier seized by the Sub-Divisional Mag...
Tag this Judgment!Manager of Kargali Colliery Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
Aftab Alam, J. 1. Does the provision of Section 24 of the Standards of Weights & Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Enforcement Act') extend to the petrol/H.S.D. pump, with underground tank and fittings, installed at a colliery under the consumer petrol/H.S.D. Hire & Supply Agreement with the Oil Corporation and whether the colliery is obliged under the law to have the petrol/H.S.D. pump installed on its premises duly verified and stamped even though the entire supply of petrol/H.S.D. is consumed by the colliery internally and no amount of petrol/ H.S.D. is sold by it to any third party These are the questions that arise for consideration in this case. 2. This writ petition is filed by the Manager of Kargali Colliery which is a unit of M/ s Central Coal Fields Limited. The coal mining operation requires the use of different types of vehicles and machines all of which run on petrol or high speed diesel e.g. dumpers, bulldozers, heavy earth mover...
Tag this Judgment!S.K.G. Consolidated Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
1. This writ petition is filed against an award by the Industrial Tribunal, Patna, on reference made to it under Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The industrial dispute under reference was between the management of S.K.G. Sugar Limited Distillery Branch, Mirganj, Gopalaganj and their workmen represented by three different unions and it arose from retrenchment of some workmen working in the Distillery Section. It is not in dispute that at the time of the retrenchment the distillery at Mirganj was under the management and ownership of the petitioner-company which was then known as S.K.G Sugar, Ltd., and it is also not in dispute that the retrenchment was made by the petitioner-company which was the employer of the concerned workmen at that time. However, shortly before the dispute was referred to the Tribunal by notification, dated July 11, 1981, the establishment to which the dispute related was transferred by the petitioner-company to another company, namely, Uni...
Tag this Judgment!J.N. Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-28-2000
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioner has challenged the Memo No. 7 dated 8.2.2000 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi whereby a charge-sheet has been framed and served upon the petitioner in connection with case No. 20 in contemplation of a departmental proceeding. The charge against the petitioner is that during his tenure as Circle Officer, Ranchi, he has done some illegality in passing order in a mutation proceeding in respect of Gairmazurua Malik land and thereby caused huge loss to the Government.2. The petitioner earlier moved this Court by filing CWJC No. 3505/99 R challenging the letter issued by the Department directing the Deputy Commissioner to frame charge and send it to the Government along with other documents for the purpose of doing the needful. This Court dismissed the writ application in terms of the order dated 17.2.2000 holding that the writ application was premature. The petitioner preferred L.P.A. against the aforesaid order being LPA N...
Tag this Judgment!Suresh Sahu and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-27-2000
Anil Kumar Sinha, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order of conviction, sentence dated 19.6.93 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gulma in Sessions Trial No. 218/91, whereby and whereunder he convicted the appellants under Section 304B/34 IPC read with Sections 201/34, IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight years each under Sections 304B/34, IPC and further sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under Sections 201/34, IPC.2. The prosecution case in brief is that the information's daughter Mundrika Devi was married with the appellant Suresh Sahu in the month of Baisakh, 1990 according to Hindu rites and at the time of marriage, a sum of Rs. 24,000 was given to Suresh Sahu for purchasing a motor cycle. But, Suresh Sahu demanded another sum of Rs. 10,000 which was promised to be fulfilled later on by the informant. It is alleged that in the year 1991, the appellant Suresh Sahu along...
Tag this Judgment!Kamal Mandal and ors. Vs. Sri Ragho Mandal and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-27-2000
Gurusharan Sharma, J.1. Defendants are appellants. Plaintiffs filed Title Suit No. 24 of 1981 for declaration that Revisional Survey entry in respect of disputed land, detailed in Schedule 'Ka' to the plaint in the names of defendants 1 and 2 was illegal as also for declaration of their title and recovery of possession thereon.2. One Singheshwar Mandal owned and possessed 10.73 acres land bearing C.S. plot No. 886 in village Mohanpur. He had no issue and so he adopted Govind Mandal, son of Santoshi Mandal of village Surmaha as his son, but subsequently Singheshwar Mandal, was blessed with three sons, namely, Anathi Mandal, defendant No. 10, Jagannath Mandal, defendant No. 12 and Ragho Mandal, plaintiff No. 1. Defendant No. 10 had a son, Lakhan Mandal, defendant No. 11, Jagannth Mandal had three sons, Hari Mandal, defendant No. 13, Ratanlal Mandal, as since dead and Suresh Mandal, defendant No. 14 Wakil Mandal, defendant No. 15 was son of late Ratanlal Mandal and Sudania Devi, defendan...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »