Patna Court February 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Param Jit Kaur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
1. Ms. Paramjit Kaur has filed this petition feeling aggrieved by an order dated 3.4.1992 vide which her representation for counting of her service rendered as LDC on adhoc basis for seniority and other purposes w.e.f 21.12.1882 has been rejected. She pleads that she was appointed as LDC through Annexure A-2. She is possessed of qualification of graduation. Her appointment was made after her name was sponsored through employment exchange and it was made by Regional Labour Commissioner. She was confirmed as LDC vide orders dated 12.4.1990 w.e.f 4.4.1990 through Annexure A-3. Pleads that appointments to the post of LDCs are made through Staff Selection Commission. With the consent of the SSC, respondent department had conducted a special qualifying examination limited to adhoc employees in July, 1985 in which she had appeared and qualified. After being declared successful, she was regularised as a clerk w.e.f. 1,4,1.1986.There has been no break in her'service since 1982 to the date of r...
Ramachandran K. Vs. Uco Bank and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioner seeks issuance of an appropriate writ declaring the provisions of promotion policy as contained in circular No. 203 of 1992-93 dated October 1, 1992 and in particular Paragraph 14.1 of the Promotion policy of the respondent-Bank as ultra vires of the Constitution and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and further for a direction to quash the order dated September 5, 1994 issued under the signature of respondent No. 37 the Deputy General Manager whereby the petitioner has been debarred from promotion for the next three years. 2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass: The respondent, United Commercial Bank is a nationalised bank and is an instrumentality of the Central Government. The Petitioner was appointed as a Stenographer in the year, 1976 in the said Bank and was transferred and posted from one branch to another branch. In 1994 the petitioner was promoted to Middle Management Grade scale-II and ...
Kamakshi Worah Vs. Vinoba Bhave University and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/order declaring that the decision of the respondents for holding re-examination on 28th January, 2000 for clinical and oral pursuant to the notification dated 13-1-2000 published in the daily news paper is illegal, arbitrary, mala fide and wholly without jurisdiction and further for quashing the office order dated 19-12-99 (Annexure 9) issued by the Controller of the examination whereby he has intimated the Principal, Patliputra Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad for holding of re-examination fororal and clinical in respect of the candidates who have secured more than 70% marks in clinical examination in surgery. 2. The fact of the case lies in a narrow compass. 3. The petitioner was admitted in the MBBS course in the year 1993 in Patliputra Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad (hereinafter referred to as 'PMC College'). The petitioner successfully competed and passed her MBBS fi...
Baldeo Choudhary and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
Shiva Kirti Singh, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The intervention application in C.W.J.C. No. 11/2000 is allowed.3. All these lour writ petitions arise out of and are directed against one common order of transfer notified by the Additional Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna on 29.12.1999. Since all these cases invoke common question of law hence, they have been heard together with consent of parties and are being disposed of by a common order.4. Petitioners in all the four cases were holding the post of District Transport Officer at their respective places of posting. They had been so posted for less than a year when the impugned order was issued transferring them on post of District Transport Officer at different, places and the grievance of the petitioners is that the normal period of such transfer is of two years and they have suffered premature transfer without consideration of their cases by the Establishment Committee constituted for the purpose and even at ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›