Patna Court January 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Puran Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-05-2000
D.P.S. Choudhary, J.1. Both the appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 25.1.1994 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trail No. 745/35 of 1992/93. Appellants Puran Singh and Lakhbir Kaur (of Cr. Appeal No. 39 of 1994) were convicted under Section 368 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the I.P.C. and both have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine a further period of Sentence of R.I. for six months. Appellant Kamlesh Punyark (of Cr. Appeal No. 41/94) has been convicted under Sections 366 and 366A of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for eight years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- under each count. In default of payment of fine, further sentence of period of two years. The sentences are to run concurrently.2. The prosecution case is brief is that the victim girl Rabindra Kaur alias Baby (P.W. 8) in her fardbeyan (Ext. 1) recor...
Sur Bihari Mandal Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-05-2000
Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In this writ petition, petitioner is aggrieved on account of non-payment of the remaining 10% of his pension and full gratuity, though he retired from service long back on 31.1.1992.2. From the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of Special Secretary and Deputy Secretary to the Government of Bihar in the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 respectively), it appears that a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner and simultaneously criminal case was also instituted against him hearing Harijan P.S. Patna Case No. 55/85 under Sections 419/420/ 468/465/477/120, I.P.C. The charge against the petitioner is that he was appointed on the basis of his being a Scheduled Caste person which later on inquiry was found that the did not belong to Scheduled Caste. However, the Government decided that till the disposal of-the criminal case, departmental proceeding be stayed. But later by virtue of order dated 16.9.1992 pas...
Om Prakash Gupta and Etc. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-05-2000
Choudhary S.N. Mishra, J.1. In these applications, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the criminal proceedings including the order dated 5-1-1996 passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance, whereby he has directed to frame charges against the accused persons including the petitioners in an offence punishable under Sections 420, 201 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioners are the proprietor of Ashiana Plaza and the Electrical Executive Engineer of the Electricity Board respectively.2. One Ram Kripal Singh, Sub-Inspector, Vigilance Cell, Patna had filed a case before the Officer-in-Charge, Vigilance to the effect that Shri Ramghan Yadav, Member, Bihar State Electric Supply Workers Union has written a letter to Shri Bibhuti Kavi, Member, Bihar Legislative Council and on the basis of which an enquiry was instituted. It is alleged that Ashiana Plaza having Consumer No. 131068 provided a ...
Baidyanath Hathi Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-05-2000
Indu Prabha Singh, J.1. This is an application under Sections 397, 398 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code'). It is directed against the order dated 15-11-1994 passed in Complaint Case No. C.632/94 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi by which he dismissed the complaint petition filed on behalf of the petitioner.2. From the present application it appears that the petitioner had filed the aforesaid complaint case in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi alleging there in that on 1-10-1994 at about 4-30 p.m. while the petitioner was inside his house, opposite party No. 2, Shri Narendra Prasad Singh, District Certificate Officer, Sitamarhi all of a sudden entered into his house and asked the petitioner to come out. When the petitioner came out of his house he was told by opposite party No. 2 that a sum of Rs. 71,000/- is due against his brother Raghunath Hathi for which a certificate case was pending. On enquiry, the petitioner told ...
Dr. Kamta Prasad Singh Vs. Nagina Prasad
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Jan-03-2000
V.N. Mishra, Member: 1. The present appeal by opposite party appellant is directed against the order dated 4.7.1997 passed by the District Forum, East Champaran, Metihari in Complaint Case No. 70/96 directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 75,000/- as compensation and Rs. 500/- as cost to the respondent-complainant. 2. The brief facts of the complaint case are that the complainant sustained a severe fracture of bone in left thigh in a bus accident on 6.2.1996. He was brought to the clinic of Dr. Tabrej Aziz where he was kept on traction for ten days. Dr. Aziz referred the complainant to the opposite party on 16.2.1996, who had examined the complainant on 10.2.1996 in the clinic of Dr. Aziz. The complainant was admitted to the clinic of the opposite party on 17.2.1996 when the opposite party after thorough examination prescribed several medicines, X-ray, needles etc. for proposed operation. The opposite party performed the operation on the point of fracture in the left thigh and put ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›