Patna Court August 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Awdhesh Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-03-1999
S.K. Katriar, J.1. This application under the inherent powers of the Court has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 16-8-93, passed by the learned Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sadar Darbhanga, in M.R. case No. 882/93 Rajendra Yadav v. Awdhesh Singh, whereby proceedings under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), have been converted into one under Section 145 of the Code.2. While assailing the validity of the impugned order, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that by order dated 16-8-93, the learned S.D.M., Sadar Darbhanga, was pleased to initiate the proceedings under Section 144 of the Code against both the parties which have been registered as M.R. case No. 882/93. Thereafter, the proceedings were initiated between the parties under Section 48-E of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). This is evident from the notices issued to the parties, photo copies of which are An...
Bal Bahadur Ram @ Karak Ram and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-03-1999
R.N. Prasad, J.1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 3-1-1987 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Arrah in Sessions Trial No. 306 of 1984 whereby appellant Bal Bahadur Ram @ Karak Ram has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and rest two appellants, namely, Baleshwar Ram and Bahadur Ram have been convicted for the office under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life.2. The prosecution case is that one Panchratan Ram gave his fardbeyan on 18-3-1984 at about 3.30 p.m. that while Nirmal Ram of Itarhi Anchal was passing through the lane and reached near the house of Chandrika Ram and Jiut Ram, appellants Baleshwar Ram and Bahadur Ram @ Lal Bahadur caught hold of his both hands and appellant Bal Bahadur Ram gave dagger blow on the chest as a resul...
Muchhu Sao Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-02-1999
S.K. Katriar, J.1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the impugned order of cognizance dated 27-7-93 passed by the Special Judge, Nalanda, Biharsharif, in Biharsharif PS Case No. 251/93 State of Bihar v. Muchho Sao, whereby cognizance has been taken of the alleged offences under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act read with provision of Clause (3) of the Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984, and the petitioner has been summoned to stand his trial.2. The Supply Inspector, Biharsharif, lodged an FIR with the Biharsharif Police Station alleging therein that somebody was driving a bullock-cart with mustard oil (6 qntls. & 15 kgs.), packed in 41 tins, were loaded on the bullock-cart. On being intercepted and questioned, the bullock-cart driver allegedly informed the informant that the good belonged to the petitioner herein. Accordingly, the informant visited the place of the petitioner where, according ...
Rama Mistri Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-02-1999
S.K. Katriar, J.1. The sole petitioner has preferred this criminal revision application against the impugned judgment dated 5-1-93, passed by Shri Jiwan Tigga, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda, Biharsharif, in Cr. Appeal No. 22/26 of 1987/88, Rama Mistri v. State of Bihar, whereby the judgment of the trial Court has been affirmed in lull. The learned SDJM, Hilsa, by his judgment dated 9-4-87, passed in GR Case No. 1128/ 79 (Trial No. 314 of 1987) State through Yogeshwar Singh, SI, Hilsa Police Station v. Rama Mistry, has convicted the petitioner herein under Sections 25-A and 26 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), and sentenced him to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 25-A, but did not inflict any separate sentence under Section 26 of the Act.2. During course of raid by the Sub-Inspector of the Hilsa Police Station, from the residential premises of the petitioner on 28-12-79, at about 5.45 p.m., a number of incriminating materials meant to m...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›