Patna Court March 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hit Narayan Chaudhary Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-10-1999
P.K. Sarkar, J.1. This petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. is for quashing the order of cognizance dated 3.3.93 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (West) in G.R. Case No. 2/76.2. The brief facts leading to the present application is that O.P. No. 2 Jagarnath Chowdhury instituted a case (G.R. 2/76) alleging that a dacoiry was committed in the night intervening 2nd and 3rd January, 1976, in his house and the petitioner-accused was identified during the commission of the alleged dacoity. It was further alleged that he heard the sound of foot-steps of some persons and saw in the light of torch used by the dacoits. In the meantime, four dacoits holding Farsas in their hands surrounded him and in this process, he identified the petitioner. The Police took up the investigation of the case and submitted a Final Report bearing No. 28 dated 3.6.76 was submitted showing the case to be maliciously false under Section 395, I.P.C. The informant O.P. No. 2 filed a protest-...
G.M., Telephone, Patna and Others Vs. Rana Ranjeet Singh
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Mar-09-1999
A.N. Chaturvedi, President: 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 19.9.1996 passed by District Forum, Patna, in Case No. 1295/93. By the impugned order the District Forum has directed the opposite party-appellant to issue fresh bill against disputed bills dated 15.5.1992, 15.9.1992, 15.11.1992, 15.1.1993 and 15.3.1993, on the basis of ten calls per day besides the free calls allowed to a telephone subscriber. The District Forum has further directed the opposite party-appellant to adjust the amounts paid by the complainant against bills dated 15.5.1992, 15.9.1992 and 15.11.1992 towards the fresh bills and refund the excess amount to the complainant. There is further direction for payment of Rs. 10,000/- to the complainant as compensation and for restoration of his telephone connection. 2. The case of the complainant before the District Forum was that the bills with regard to his telephone No. 350618 (old No. 56556) were excessive and inflated and his telephone was disconnect...
Nayak Mills Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Samastipur and Another
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Mar-09-1999
A.N. Chaturvedi, President: 1. Both the appeals are directed against the order dated 19.5.1995 passed by District Forum, Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 16 of 1995 and hence are being disposed of by this common judgment. Appeal No. 453/95 has been filed by Naik Mills through its proprietor Arjun Prasad Naik who was complainant before the District Forum in the said Case No. 16 of 1995. Appeal No. 472/95 has been filed by National Insurance Company Ltd. (opposite party before the District Forum) having Branch Office at Samastipur and Divisional Office at Muzaffarpur through its Deputy Manager of Regional Office at Patna. By the impugned order the District Forum has directed the National Insurance Company to pay Rs. 1,14,500/- to the complainant as insurance claim within one month with Rs. 100/- as cost. The said complainant has filed the said appeal No. 453/95 for correcting the said amount of Rs. 1,14,500/- as 1,30,500/- and allowing him Rs. 20,000/- as compensation for the damage caus...
Mukhlal Mahta Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-08-1999
1. What is the extent of preference to which a Cooperative Society is entitled in the matter of settlement of sand as minor mineral under the provisions of the Bihar Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1972? This is the question that falls for consideration in this case and the answer to this simple question is made difficult due to some random and disjointed amendments introduced in the rules. Before adverting to the relevant rules, however, it would be appropriate to take note of the brief facts which give rise to the aforesaid question.2. The parties are in dispute over settlement of all the sand ghats of Barakar river falling in the district of Dumka. Respondent No. 4 is the Secretary of a Co-operative Society registered under the name of Karmoi Labour Co-operative Society Limited. He made an application dated 8.11.1998 (Annexure-A) to the Assistant District Mines Officer, Dumka for the settlement of the sand ghats in question for the year 1999 in favour of the Co-operative Society. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›