Patna Court December 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suniram Kisku Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-01-1999
D.P.S. Choudhary, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28th of September, 1993 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka (Santhal Pargana) in Sessions Case No. 503 of 1990 convicting the accused-appellant under Sections 304B, 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 10 years under Sections 304B and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and further sentenced to three years R.I. under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.2. The case of the prosecution in short is that the informant Somai Besra, father of deceased (P.W. 1) in his fardbeyan (Ext. 1) alleged that his Sala Mohan Kisku (P.W. 9) informed him on 31.1.1990 at 4.00 p.m. that his daughter Guni Besra has been murdered in her sasural by the accused. On receipt of the information the informant along with his son Haradhan Besra (P.W. 2), Misi Besra (P.W. 4) and Dhaniram, a. co-villager (P.W. 5) went to the ...
Birendra Prasad Gupta Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-01-1999
Chy. S.N. Mishra, J.1. In this case, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 5-l2-1995 passed by the learned Magistrate whereby prayer of the petitioner for discharge in terms of Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected. It appears that on the basis of the first information report, a case was instituted being Danapur P.S. Case No. 237 of 1993 and after usual investigation, the Police submitted a final form stating the case to be untrue. The complainant-opposite party filed a petition by way of protest and on the basis thereof, cognizance was taken of an offence punishable under Sections 420, 463, 464 and 468 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. The petitioner, thereafter, filed a petition in terms of Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for discharge which has been rejected by the impugned order, hence, this application.2. Mr. Dwivedi appearing on behalf of the petitioner has challenged the order solely on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›