Patna Court October 1998 Judgments
Boc India Limited Vs. Zinc Products and Company Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-09-1998
S.N. Jha, J. 1. This is a petition for winding up of Zinc Products and Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent company') under Sections 433 (e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The said company was incorporated with the object of carrying on the business of manufacture and trade of distilled zinc dust and other allied products of zinc metal. The petitioner, BOC India Limited (formerly known as IOL Ltd.) is also a company incorporated under the Companies Act having its factory premises at Asansol and Jamshedpur 'where it carries on the business of manufacture and supply of various industrial and medical gases to its consumers. The petitioner-company supplied industrial gases to the respondent-company from its Asansol and Jamshedpur factories and provided certain other facilities incidental to the supply between 1988 and 1991. According to the petitioner, the respondent-company owes a sum of Rs. 5,48,978.16 to it on account of su...
Tag this Judgment!G.S. Refractories and anr. Vs. Agrawal Brothers
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-08-1998
S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J.1. Heard Mr. N.N. Tewari followed by Mr. B.K. Jha, learned Counsel for the appellants and Mr. R.S. Majumdar, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the First Additional District Judge, Dhanbad passed in Title Appeal No. 80/94 by reason of which the appellants appeal has been dismissed by affirming the judgment and decree of eviction passed by the trial Court in Title (Eviction) Suit No. 126/87.3. Learned Counsel for the appellants has contended that without adding of the partners of unregistered firm, the suit has been decreed by the trial Court ignoring the ground of non-joinder of necessary party. He also submitted that on the death of original partner of the firm, non-impleading of the existing partner vitiate the entire legal proceeding and the judgment and decree of the Courts below become non-est Last but not the least, learned Counsel contended that on the facts and circumstances, the learne...
Tag this Judgment!ishwari Dutta Jha @ I.D. Jha Vs. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Li ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Oct-02-1998
R.A. Sharma, J.1. Whether the petitioner-appellant, whose claim for promotion to higher posts was not considered earlier on account of pendency of the departmental proceedings, is entitled to be considered for promotion with retrospective effect and consequential benefits after he has been exonerated from the charges? Is the question involved in this appeal.2. The appellant is an employee of the Government of India undertaking, known as Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company). In the year 1985 he was promoted as the Zonal Engineer. In the year 1989 his case for promotion to the next higher post of Superintending Engineer was placed before the Departmental Promotion Committee, but it was not considered because the departmental proceeding was contemplated against him. A charge-sheet dated 30.3.1992 was served on him, in response to which he submitted his reply. The departmental proceeding remained pending for considerable long period. It was o...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›