Patna Court January 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanhaiya Lal Vs. Shivjee Prasad and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-06-1998
S.N. Jha, J.1. These two revision petitions under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (in short 'the Act'), arising out of the same judgment, have been heard together and are disposed of by this common order.2. The plaintiff-opposite party filed Eviction Suit No. 13 of 1989 for eviction of one Most. Tetari from the suit premises standing over 11 dhurs land of plot No. 1239 situate at Mirganj on the ground of personal necessity. According to the plaintiff, the aforesaid plot was Gairmajrua of Hathwa Raj, different portions of which were settled by it with different persons for construction of houses and shops. Butan Ram, grand father of the plaintiff and Mahendra Ram took settlement of the disputed land from Hathwa Raj on 2.3.25 on Nazrana of Rs. 22/-. No rent was fixed as the settlement was for residential purposes. Butan Ram constructed tiled-roof room thereon. He later took settlement of another piece of land adjacent west of the disputed ...
Bihar Minority Secondary Teacher's Association Unit Vs. State of Bihar ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-06-1998
R.M. Prasad, J.1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the Bihar Minority Secondary Teachers' Association Unit, Gopalganj. through its Secretary seeking direction to the respondents to make full payment of salary on monthly basis from Treasury to the teaching and non-teaching staff of Minority Secondary Schools and further to pay difference of salary of 22 months at a time, of Fourth Pay Revision Committee which benefit was given from 1.3.1989. but payment was made from 1.4.1991 and also difference of salary of selection grade and time bound promotion from due date, besides other similar general type of reliefs.2. The petitioner claims to be a registered Association and has filed this writ petition in the representative capacity.3. A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents which respect to the maintainability of the writ petition at the instance of the Association. It was contended that the petitioner has neither 'annexed any document regarding registration ...
Mahabir Turundu and anr. Vs. Nage Munda and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-06-1998
Narayan Roy, J.1. I have heard Counsel for the parties.2. The defendants are the appellants and this appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 8.8.1979 and 18.8.1979 passed by the Addl. Subordinate Judge, Cumla, in Title Suit No. 105 of 1977 decreeing the suit for declaration of title.3. Briefly stated the case of the plaintiffs is that the suit lands were recorded in the names of Sangram and Chango Mundari, sons of Gajua Mundari, Dackua son of Sangram Mundari, Mangra Mundari son of Sanika Mundari and Sanika Mundari, Johan Mundari under Khata No. 75 in the cadasteral survey of records of rights and in the Revisional survey, the same lands have been recorded under Khata No. 165 in the names of Somra Muda son of Dackua Munda, the ancestor of the plaintiffs as Saikadar but the recorded tenant was holding the suit lands in his own right, title and interest and never paid saikapaddy to anyone. The recorded tenant died long ago leaving behind the plaintiffs as the heirs and success...
Sudhir Kumar Vs. Ranchi University, Ranchi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-04-1998
R.A. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, as a Public Interest Litigation, seeking writ of mandamus directing the Ranchi University, Ranchi (Respondent No. 1) and its Vice-Chancellor (Respondent No. 2) to lodge a criminal case against Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 for misuse of official power, committing misappropriation of public fund and cheating the respondent University in conspiracy with each other and also to initiate a proceeding for recovery of huge public fund, which has been misappropriated by paying salary to Respondent No. 3 as teacher of Mandar College, teacher of Women's College, Ranchi and also in the head of Junior Research Fellowship, at a time, causing serious wrongful loss to the Respondent No. 1 in conspiracy with each other and under the influence of the Respondent No. 3, who is the husband of the Respondent No. 4. Prayer for initiation of disciplinary proceeding against the said respondents has also been made.2...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›