Patna Court August 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gobardhan Barai and anr. Vs. Aasari Khan and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
S.N. Mishra, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants, respondents owner and the insurance company. Having regard to the order that I propose to pass in this appeal, it is not necessary to give the details of facts of this case; suffice it to say that the claimants-appellants have filed an application before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for grant of compensation on account of the death of Ram Ashish Barai, who died due to motor vehicle accident on 5.4.1990. The admitted position is that the father and brother of the deceased filed an application for compensation wherein the wife was not made an applicant only because she was married to the victim only one and a half months before the date of accident; rather she was transposed in the category of the pro forma opposite party No. 4, in the claim petition. The court has rejected the claim of the applicants only on the ground that the wife being the class I heir has not been made an applicant and as such the claim petition is ...
Brij Kishore Jhawar Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J.1. Heard Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.D. Agrawal, learned GP II for the respondents and with their consent both the review applications are being disposed of by this common order at this stage itself.2. Though in both these applications a common prayer has been made to review the judgment dated 12.3.96 passed in Cr. WJC Nos. 90 of 1989 (R) 91 of 1989 (R), the petitioners are different whereas in Review application No. 1/96 (R) petitioner is Brij Kishore Jhawar, in Review application No. 2/96 (R) Om Prakesh Kapila is the petitioner. They have prayed for reviewing the judgment and order dt. 12.3.96 Reported in (1997) 1 BLJR 433 passed in aforesaid writ applications and to restore the same on Board and, therefore, allowing the said review applications by quashing the proceeding in Special Case No. 30/89 pending before the Special Judge (Vigilance) Ranchi arising out of Patna Vigilance P.S. Case No. 5/89 under Section 409, ...
Jitendra Singh Vs. M/S. Patna Gauhati Roadways and Another
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. The complainant has filed this case for compensation alleging negligence and deficiency in service against the opposite party in transportation of goods. 2. The facts of the case as put in by the complainant may be briefly noticed. The complainant is a dealer in steel products and is the proprietor of M/s. Singh Trading Company, Danapur. The opposite party are transporter who render service for carrying and transportation of goods from one place to another. On 6.7.91 the complainant purchased 10.25 tonnes of Iron Rods of different sizes and description worth Rs. 1,15,892.50 paise from Perfect Steel Products, Ranchi Branch and on 26.7.91 he booked his goods with M/s. Patna Gauhati Roadways, Ranchi opposite party No. 1 of which opposite party No. 2 to 4 are proprietors, for carrying them from Ranchi to Danapur. The opposite party agreed to receive the freight of Rs. 1800.00 at Danapur on delivery of the goods at Danapur. The goods were received by the opposite p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›