Patna Court December 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dasarath Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
N. Pandey, J. 1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is for an appropriate writ, quashing the Gazette notification, contained in Bihar Gazette Extraordinary dated 11-10-1982 (Annexure-2), whereby, the State Government in exercise of its power conferred upon it under Sections 9(1)(a) and 74(b) of the Indian Stamp Act, hereinafter called as 'the Act', prescribed that functions of 'deed writing' and 'trade of stamp vending' cannot be performed by the same person. 2. The petitioners, who are stamp vendors at the District Collectorate, Patna, have alleged that restriction imposed by the impugned notification is arbitrary and unreasonable, affecting their right of profession and trade, guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, Before examining the crucial question whether State Government had competence to issue the impugned notification, restricting the mode and conduct of sale of stamp, in the manner enumerated therein, and whether such a restricti...
Ashwini Kumar Sinha Vs. Rashmi Sinha Alias Guddi
Court: Patna
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
N. Pandey and A.K. Ganguly, JJ.1. This Misc. Appeal has been preferred against an order of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna, under the provisions of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Maintenance case No. 142 (M) of 1993, whereby and whereunder, the appellant herein was directed to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 500/- for maintenance of his wife.2. There appears no dispute that Rashmi Sinha, the sole respondent, is the legally wedded wife of the appellant. The marriage of the couple was solemnised on 15.5.1989 in accordance with Hindu rights and customs at Patna. Unfortunately Rashmi Sinha after some time noticed that her husband had developed illicit relationship with one Manju Devi. The further allegation is that the appellant used to assault the respondent and to demand money for purchasing motorbike etc. It is alleged that the appellant forcibly turned the respondent out of the house and withheld all the belongings, including ornaments etc. It is further stat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›