Patna Court June 1994 Judgments
Akhil Bhartiye Grahak Panchayat Vs. Chief General Manager (Telecom), B ...
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Jun-20-1994
K.P. Sinha, Member: 1. In this complaint petition the Akhil Bhartiye Grahak Panchayat, Jehanabad has complained against the Chief General Manager, Telecommunications, Bihar that even after the inauguration of the Jehanabad Electronic Exchange on 16.8.90 and the announcement from the Telephone Department that the pulse rate for telephonic calls made on STD from Jehanabad to Patna and Jehanabad to Gaya was 36/48/48 seconds, the STD calls were being charged at the rate of pulse rate of 12/24/48 for Patna-Jehanabad and Jehanabad-Gaya. The radial distance from Jehanabad to Patna and Jehanabad to Gaya is between 20 to 50 kms. and the STD Tarrif charge should be therefore 36-48-48 but the Jehanabad-Patna rate was being over charged at the pulse rate of 12 seconds for full-time STD calls. In support of the complaint the complainant filed two receipts which showed pulse rate of 12 seconds. The complainant has also drawn attention to the inquiry which got conducted by the District Forum, Jehanab...
Tag this Judgment!S. Sadrul Haque Vs. the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Jun-14-1994
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 23rd September, 1992 passed by the District Forum, Gaya dismissing Complaint Case No. 132 of 92 filed by the appellant here who was complainant against the respondent here who was the O.P. before the District Forum. 2. The facts of the case may be briefly stated. The complainant had applied to the Inspector General (Registeration) Patna (the opposite party) for certified copies of the certain documents which was not been given to the complainant for any reply was communicated to him till 28th September, 1992. Hence the complainant filed case before the District Forum for a direction to the opposite party to supply the certified copies of the documents and claimed damages of Rs. 42,000.00 for misleading the District Forum in Case No. 37/91 filed earlier by the complainant for the same relief against the opposite party. It appears that the case was heard by the District Forum on 23.9.92 and the District Forum dismissed...
Tag this Judgment!Bilas Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jun-02-1994
S.K. Chattopadhyaya, J.1. In this application under Sections 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an interesting question of law has been raised by Mr. Radhey Shyam Pandey, learned Counsel, for the Petitioner.2. In order to appreciate his argument, some facts which are necessary, as follows:First information report was lodged against the petitioner on the allegation that on 20-1-1994 at 2.30 p.m. the Officer-in-Charge raided the house of the petitioner and recovered one kilogram of ganja from the roof of the house. First information report was lodged for the said offence under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act and Section 16 of the Narcotic Drugs Act.3. Mr. Pandey learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the item 'ganja' has defined in Section 2(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as, the Act') which goes to show that ganja, that is the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds and leaves wh...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›