Patna Court May 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd., Kamgar Union Vs. State of B ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-1994
A.K. Ganguly, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the Bihar State Construction Corporation Karngar Union, inter alia, praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to pay the dues in regard to the salary of members of petitioner Union, the employees of Bihar State Construction Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the said Corporation). 2. The case, as sought to be made out in this writ petition, is that the Government of Bihar by an order dated February 2, 1974 decided to form the said Corporation under the Water Resources Development Department. The said Corporation was established with the avowed object of liquidating monopoly of the contractor in respect of developmental work in Bihar. 3. Far from achieving its objectives, the affairs of the said Corporation were so badly managed that it came under a severe financial crunch to such an extent that its 1600 employees could not be paid their salary from the month of June 1991. The writ petition was, there...
Jitendra Nath Vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Manju Geeta Mishra and Others
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: May-11-1994
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. This Case (64 of 91) and Case No. 65 of 91 arise out of the same cause and therefore they have been heard together on the point of their maintainability under the Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter called the Act) and they are being disposed of by this common order. The complainant in both cases is the same. 2. The case of the complainant may be briefly stated. The Opposite Party in the Case No. 64 of 91-Dr. (Mrs.) Manju Geeta Mishra (hereinafter being referred to as Dr. (Mrs. Mishra) maintains a Nursing Home known named M.G.M. Nursing Home. Complainants wife Mrs. Bibha Nath was in the family way and she felt some labour pain on 13th August, 1991 and therefore the complainant took her to the Nursing Home of Dr. (Mrs.) Mishra at 3.00 p.m. on 13th August, 1991. On the advise of Dr. (Mrs.) Mishras the complainants wife was kept in the labour room of that nursing home. At 4.59 p.m. on the same day i.e., on 13th August, 1991, the complainants wife gave birth to a...
Shashi Kant Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-10-1994
A.K. Ganguly, J. 1. This writ petition has been moved for quashing an order issued under memo No. 15775 dated 22-9-1993 by the Joint Transport Commissioner, Bihar (respondent No. 2). 2. The contention of the writ petitioner is that he purchased the vehicle in question being No. BHK 5107 on 4th June, 1993 and on the very date he took possession of the vehicle. It has been further stated in the petition that the additional tax of the bus in question was paid up to 31st December, 1992 by the previous owner and the tax token to that effect was issued by respondent No. 3. 3. The petitioner thereafter deposited the tax for the said bus for the period 1-6-1993 to 31-8-1993 and filed an affidavit before respondent No. 3 praying for issuance of tax token for the current period and also for exemption of road tax/ additional tax for the period 1-1-1993 to 31-5-1993 as the petitioner did not ply the said bus as 'public service vehicle' for the aforesaid period.4. According to the petitioner the ...
Rajendra Rai Vs. the Election Commission of India and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-09-1994
B.L. Yadav and S.N. Jha, JJ. 1.Whether an election process, when it has commenced can be interdicted, retarded or interfered with in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India and whether an order of the Chief Electoral Officer seeking confirmation in respect of the modifications of the order passed by the Election Commissioner of India which is not final can be assumed to have become final and whether, under the circumstances of the present case, the petitioner can be said to be entitled to any relief sought for, are the short but significant questions that fall for determination in the present writ application filed by one Rajendra Rai, who is avoter of 9-Vaishali Parliamentary Constituency and he is also the President of Zila Janta Dal Vaishali.2. The factual matrix of the case is that the electoral roll of the Vaishali Parliamentary Constituency (in short, the Constituency) was revised under Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act,...
Narash Jha and ors. and Binod Kumar Verma and ors. Vs. State of Bihar ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-03-1994
S.N. Jha, J.1. As common questions of fact and law arise for consideration, these two writ petitions have been heard together and are disposed of by common order. The representative facts in so far as relevant to the controversy are, however, taken from CWJC No. 3160 of 1993.2. The petitioner were appointed as Assistant teachers in the Intermediate trained scale on different dates. In course of time on 21th December, 1990, they were promoted to the Graduate trained scale of Rs. 850-1360 pursuant to the decision of the District Education Establishment Committee in the light of circular No. 2440 dated 18th December, 1984 issued under Section 8 of the Bihar Non-Government Elementary Schools (Taking Over of Management and Control) Act, 1976 (in short 'the Act'). Their promotion was challenged in this Court in CWJC 5001 of 1991. The said writ petition was disposed of with direction to the Director, Primary Education, to consider the representation which the petitioners of that case were d...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›