Patna Court September 1992 Judgments
Smt. Madalsa Devi Vs. Smt. Mridula Chandra
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-30-1992
Aftab Alam, J. 1. These two appeals which have been heard together and are being disposed of jointly arise out of a common judgment by the first appellate court in the following circumstances. 2. The plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for eviction of the defendant from the suit premises, in addition, arrears of rent and damages or unauthorised occupation were also claimed. The trial court disallowed the reliefs of eviction and damages for unautho-rised occupation. It, however, allowed the suit only in respect of the claim for the arrears of rent. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the trial Court's judgment. The defendant also went in appeal. These two appeals were heard and disposed of by the 1st appellate court by a common judgment whereby it dismissed the defendants appeal and allowed the plaintiffs appeal decreeing the suit in whole. This necessitated filing of these two separate appeals before this court which have been heard together and are being disposed of by this jud...
Tag this Judgment!District Engineer Telecom Vs. Meena Agrawal and Others.
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Sep-16-1992
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. Revision Nos. 17,18,19 and 20 of 1992 have been heard together because there is common point of law and they are being disposed of with the consent of the learned Counsels by a common order. In all these revision applications petitioner is Telecom District Engineer, Muzaffarpur. Of course the respondents are different. The District Forum have directed the petitioners before this Commission in all these cases before the District Forum not to disconnect the telephones belonging to the opposite party of these different revision petitions who were complainant before the District Forum. 2. It appears that the respondents in these cases filed complaints before the District Forum complaining against the disputed bills. Prayer was made on behalf of the complainants in these cases to direct the opposite parties there not to disconnect their respective telephone connections and consequently these impugned orders were passed by the telephone department. By all these orde...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Birendra Mohan Pd. Sinha Vs. the New India Assurance Co. and Other ...
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Sep-15-1992
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. The complainant No. 1 the proprietor of the Complainant No. 2 M/s. Laxmi Textiles, West Patel Nagar, Patna. 2. This case has been filed by them with averments hereinafter mentioned. Complainant No. 1 after obtaining financial assistance from Central Bank of India, Rukanpura Branch, Patna and the Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna established M/s. Lakshmi Textiles a small scale industrial unit for manufacturing fine hosiery cloths and got it registered in the Industries Department, Government of Bihar bearing Registration No. 03/10/06762 dated 29.8.83. The complainant got the buildings, machines raw materials, finished and unfinished goods of the firm insured with the New India Assurance Company, Exhibition Road, Patna the opposite party No.2, under the Fire Insurance Cover. Initially the company insured the buildings, plant and machinery of the firm for 2.5 lakhs under Fire Temporary Cover Note A/c No. 608541 dated 14.11.88 for the period from 14.11.88 ...
Tag this Judgment!Firoz Khan and ors. Vs. Bibi Hasina Khanam and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-07-1992
1. In a suit instituted in 1970 protracting for about nine years with both the plaintiffs and the court hopefully but vainly waiting for the defendants to appear and contest the suit, an ex parte decree was ultimately passed on 13-1-1979. Appellant No. 1 joined by his three brothers attempted to get the decree set aside by an application under Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code (in short 'the Code'). Having failed, he along with the two non-applicants has filed this miscellaneous appeal. 2. The suit was instituted by one Deoki Singh for self and as guradian of his minor daughter for partition against his Sita Ram Singh, defendant No. 1 in the suit, on the plea that Sita had fallen in bad company, become wayward and was squandering away property. The plaintiffs impleaded Ful Kunari Devi, Deoki's wife, as proforma defendant 2nd party and the transferees as proforma defendants 3rd party. Some other transferees from Sita Ram, including the applicants/ appellants were added as proform...
Tag this Judgment!Central Bank of India Vs. Parween Nayak.
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Sep-04-1992
K.P. Sinha, Member: 1. This is an appeal against the order dated 9.8.91 passed by the learned District Forum, Sitamarhi in the complaint case No. 2 of 90 before them. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the respondent purchased from the appellant four traveller cheques bearing Nos. 114325 to 114328 for Rs. 2,500/- each from the Sitamarhi Branch of the Central Bank of India on 6.7.90. These traveller cheques were lost by her as her Briefcase which contained these traveller cheques was stolen on 11.7.90 from the Frontier Mail in which she was travelling. The complainant thereafter sent telegram from Delhi on 12.7.90 to the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Sitamarhi intimating the theft of the traveller cheques and on 16.7.90 she personally came over and claimed for the refund of the amount of Rs. 10,000/- for which he had purchased the traveller cheques which were stolen. No payment was made to her and she, therefore, made a complaint before the District Forum on 19th Decemb...
Tag this Judgment!Arya Prathamick Teachers Siksha Mahavidyalaya and ors. Vs. the Bihar S ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-02-1992
1. In this application the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a direction upon the Bihar School Examination Board to publish the results of the students of the petitioner No. 1 College for the Sessions 1983-85, 1984-86 and 1985-87. 2. The fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass. 3. The petitioner No. 1 is an institution established for imparting training to Primary School Teachers. The said school was established in the year 1979. 4. The permission was sought for from the respondent No. 1 by the petitioner so that the students of the said institution who have been given training may appear at the examination. 5. The petitioners in that connection filed a writ application in this court being CWJC No. 4863 of 1985, but this court did not permit the students to appear in the examination for the Sessions 1983-85. 6. The petitioners thereafter moved the Supreme Court of India in S.L.P. (C) No. 6890 of 1986 and by an order dated 18-7-1986 the students of the petitioner's Insti...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›