Patna Court March 1992 Judgments
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Agricultural P ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-30-1992
B. C. Basak, C. J. 1. These series of 28 writ petitions involve similar facts and common questions of law so far as the main submissions are concerned and for this reason they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. In some of these writ petitions some additional points are urged which were special to them. These writ petitions relate to the following 'agricultural produce', namely, (1) Wheat and wheat products e.g., Atta, Maida, Suji and bran, (ii) oil seeds, edible oil mustard oil, (in) sugar and (iv) Vanaspati.2. (a) C.W.J.C. Nos. 3920/85, 1201/86, 3930/86, 1222/87, 1228/87, 1272/87, 1273/87, 1333/87, 1926/87, 3810/87, 4278/87, 4289/87, 5831/87, 2354/88, 3863/88, 4497/88, 4623/88, 4803/88, 7912/88, 8705/88 and 5187/89.Excepting in CWJC 3920/85 all these applications are at the instance of flour mills which have been set up either by a Company incorporated under the Companies Act or by a partnership firm. They carry on the business of manufacturin...
Tag this Judgment!Telecom District Manager Vs. M/S. Modi Steels Ltd.
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Mar-11-1992
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 13.9.91 passed by District Forum, Patna in Complaint Case No. 9 of 1990. 2. The facts of the case may be briefly stated. The complainant-respondent received bill dated 11.8.89 sent to him by the appellant in respect of his telephone for the month of June and July, 1989 amounting to Rs. 33,222/-. According to the complainant this amount was inflated and excessive and he accordingly filed a complaint against District Manager Telephones, Patna before the District Forum for correction of the Bill. According to the complainant the bill for June and July, 1989 should in no case exceed Rs. 25,000.00. The appellant (opposite party) appeared before the District Forum and filed written statement and asserted that the bill was examined by the competent authority and is correct and as such no rebate can be granted to the complainant in respect thereof and that this was communicated to the complainant by letter No. 62320/EM/5 dat...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Vareities Vs. M/S. Auto Distributors and Others.
Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
Decided on: Mar-09-1992
B.N. Sinha, President: 1. This complaint has been filed against the opposite parties with the allegations mentioned herein-after. The Premier Automobiles Limited, opposite party No. 2 is the manufacturer of the car known as Premier 118 NE car and the O.P. No. 3 and 4 are employees of O.P. No. 2. O.P. No.l M/s. Auto Distributors Limited, Exhibition Road, Patna is the authorised dealer of the O.P. No.2. On 10.6.85 one Shri Narain Khaitan booked by applying for pur 2 chase of Premier 118NE car with the O.P. No. 1 and deposited Rs. 11,000/- by Bank Draft No. 2651/85 dated 8-6-85 being an advance against booking against Receipt No. 034014 dated 16.6.85 granted by the O.P. No. 1. On receipt of the allotment letter and information from O.P. No. 1, Shri Khaitan deposited the balance amount of Rs. 1,22,798/- for which Receipt No. 1251 dated 13.7.87 was granted to him and the car was delivered by the O.P. No. 1 on 14.7.87 to Shri Khaitan. Subsequently Shri Khaitan transferred the said car to the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›