Orissa Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nari@ Narasingh Mohanty Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-22-2014
,ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(Crl.) No.1684 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty, S/o. Magi Mohanty, AT: Bada Sahi Huma: Ganjam ...Petitioner -VersusUnion of India & others ...Opposite Parties For petitioner : M/s. D.R.Mohapatra, A.Pasayat & D.Samantray For Opp. Parties : Mr. A.K. Bose, Asst. Solicitor General of India (For O.P.1-Union of India) Mr. M.S. Sahoo Addl. Standing Counsel (For O.Ps. 2 to 6-State) -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.The present Writ Petition seeking issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus has been filed by the petitioner-Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty challenging the legality of the order of his detention dated 15.11.2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Ganjam under Section 3(2) of the 2 National Security Act, 1980 on the ground that such order as well...
Dr. Geetanjali Panda Vs. Dr. Pranaya Ballari Mohanty and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-19-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.A. No.30 of 2014 From the order and judgment 02.12.2013 and 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. Dr. (Smt.) Geetanjali Panda . Appellant Versus Dr. Pranaya Ballari Mohanty & others . Respondents For Appellant : Mr. K.K.Swain, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Sameer Ku. Das, Advocate (R-1) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 10.09.2014 Date of Judgment: 19.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K. Rath, J.The appellant has prayed, inter alia, to quash the order and judgment dated 02.12.2003 and 18.12.2013 respectively passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. By order dated 02.12.2013, the learned Single Judge dismissed the application filed by the appellant for addition of the party and eventually allowed the writ petition filed by respondent no.1 by judgment dated 18.12.2013.2. Though ...
Radhika Padhan Vs. Debaraj Meher
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-12-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.A. No.272 of 2014 From the judgment/order dated 15.07.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.21530 of 2012. Radhika Padhan . Appellant Versus Debaraj Meher . Respondent For Appellant : Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.S.K. Mishra, Advocate (R-1) Addl. Government Advocate (R-2) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 05.09.2014 Date of Judgment: 12.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K. Rath, J.This writ appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 15.7.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.21530 of 2012. By the said order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and thereby confirmed the order dated 6.11.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patnagarh, (in short, the Election Tribunal.), in E.P No.2 of 2012 allowing the applicat...
Budhiram Ho Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.4722 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------------Budhiram Ho . Petitioner Versus State of Orissa and others . Opposite parties For Petitioner -- Mr.M.K.Mohanty, Advocate For Opp. Parties -- Mr.S.N.Mohapatra, Standing Counsel for S & ME. (For O.Ps. 1 to3) Mr.A.K.Biswal, Advocate (For O.P.4) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 4.9.2014 : Date of judgment: 10.9.2014 DR.A.K.RATH, J.In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the opposite parties to take immediate action for dismissal of opposite party no.4 from Government service as per Rule 18 read with Rule 2 13 of the Orissa Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962.2. Bereft of unnecessary details, the short facts of the case of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›