Orissa Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahas Das Vs. Chairman, Paradip Port Trust, Paradip and Another
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK SECOND APPEAL NO.231 OF 2001 From the judgment and decree dated 3.7.2001 and 13.7.2001, respectively, passed by Shri A.C. Pattnaik, Additional District Judge, Jagatsinghpur in T. A. Case No.9 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1998 and 7.2.1998, respectively, passed by Smt. V. Jayashree, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jagatsinghpur in T.S. No.167 of 1997. __________ Rahas Das Appellant Versus Chairman, Paradip Port Trust, Paradip and another For Appellant Respondents : M/s. Budhadev Routray, A.K. Baral, D.K. Mohapatra & P.K. Das For Respondents : M/s. S.K. Padhi, Miss D. Mohapatra, B.K. Sahoo & D. Das PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 8.9.2014 Date of judgment : 26.09.2014 R. DASH, J.Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 3.7.2001 and 13.7.2001, respectively, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jagatsinghpur in T.A. Case No.9 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.1.1998...
Binan Kumar Mohanty and Others Vs. Water and Land Management Institute ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 & W.P.(C) No.5643 of 2002 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------In O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 Binan Kumar Mohanty & others -versus- Petitioners Water & Land Management Institute (WALMI) & others Opposite Parties For Petitioners For Opposite Party Nos.1& 2 For Opposite Party No.3 : M/s. J.K. Rath (Sr.Adv.), S.N. Rath, P.K. Rout, S. MIshra, C.K.Rajguru & D.N. Rath. : M/s. S.K. Nayak, B.K. Sahoo, M.S. Sahoo, Miss M. Bhanja & Miss D. Nayak. : Mr. S. Kanungo, Addl. Govt. Advocate In W.P.(C). No.5643 of 2002 Nikhil Kumar Panda & others .. Petitioners -versusState of Orissa & others .. Opposite Parties For Petitioner : M/s. J.K. Rath (Sr.Adv.), S.N. Rath, P.K. Rout, C.K. Rajguru & S. MIshra Mr. S. Kanungo, Addl. Govt. Advocate. For Opp. Party No.1 : For Opp.Party nos.2 & 3 : M/s. S.K. Nayak, B.K. Sahoo, M.S. Sahoo, Miss M. Bhanja & Miss D. Nayak. _____________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTI...
Deo Ispat Alloys Ltd. Rep. Its Director, Sri Chand Vs. Commnr. of Comm ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6245 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Deo Ispat Alloys Limited, Bhawanipur, Kirei, Dist: Sundargarh, Represented by its Director, Sri Chandrakant Choudhury Petitioner -VersusCommissioner of Commercial Taxes, Orissa, Banijyakar Bhawan, Cantonment Road, Cuttack and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Mr. Damodar Pati For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel (Commercial Taxes Deptt.) ---------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Order : 26.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order of assessment dated 26.11.2013 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Rourkela Circle, Panposh under Section 43 of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2014 (for short, the OVAT Act) for the period from 01.04.2009 to 2 06.09.2012 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary a...
Balaram Barik Vs. D.M. and Divisional Superintendent, East Coast Railw
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4225 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------------ Balaram Barik Petitioner Opposite Parties -VersusDivisional Manager and Divisional Superintendent, East Coast Railway, Khurda Road, Khurda For Petitioner : M/s. Prafulla Ku. Rath, R.C.Jena, P.K.Satpathi, R.N. Parija & A.K. Rout For Opposite Parties : Shri Anindya Kumar Mishra PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE S.C. PARIJ.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Judgment : 26.09.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------S.C. Parija, J.This writ petition has been filed challenging the action of the Railway authorities-opposite parties, in trying to evict the petitioner from the Railway land in question, with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to gran...
Narendra Kumar Ratha and Others Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. Nos. 590 of 2000 and O.J.C. No.15057 of 1999 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------In O.J.C. No.590 of 2000 Narendra Kumar Ratha and others Petitioners -versusState of Orissa and others Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s. P.K. Ray, P.K. Panda For Opposite Party No.1 : Mr. A.K. Mishra Addl. Govt. Advocate For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. S.K.Nayak-1, Sr. Counsel. In O.J.C. No.15057 of 1999 Ganesh Ram Pradhan and others Petitioners -versusState of Orissa and others Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s. P.K. Ray, P.K. Panda For Opposite Party No.1 : Mr. A.K. Mishra Addl. Govt. Advocate For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. S.K.Nayak-1, Sr. Counsel _____________________ 2 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 10.09.2014 | Date of judgment : 26.09.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.Both the writ applications having arisen out of same cause of action were heard together and are disposed of by this com...
Suvendu Sekhar Mohapatra Vs. Smrutirekha Mohapatra
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK MATA No.110 of 2013 An application under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Suvendu Sekhar Mohapatra Appellant versus Smrutirekha Mohapatra Respondent For Appellant : In person. For Respondent : M/s. Bijaya Kumar Behera(2), A. Mohanty and S.N. Mishra. PRESENT: THE HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH Date of hearing : BISWANATH RATH, J.25.07.2014 Date of Judgment : 25.09.2014 In this appeal, the appellant-husband has assailed the judgment dated 24.12.2012 passed in C.P. No.125 of 2011 by the Family Court, Berhampur, Ganjam on an application filed under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage of the appellant with the respondent-wife. 2 2. The case of the husband before the Family Court was that he got married as per the Hindu Customs and rites on 17.04.2006 at Berhampur. He was a well settled software engineer and hailed from a respective family. He specific...
Niranjan Behera Vs. Sri Sudarsan Bandha and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK F.A.O. NO.100 OF 2009 From the order dated 6.01.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in Misc. Case No.101 of 1998 arising out of O.S.No.327 of 1996. __________ Niranjan Behera Appellant Versus Sri Sudarsan Bandha & others For Appellant Respondents : M/s.Prahlad Kar, G. Kar, A. K. Mohanty & K. Khuntia. For Respondents : M/s. Sushant Kumar Pradhan, & S.B. Mohanta. PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 17.09.2014 R. DASH, J.Date of judgment : 25.09.2014 This appeal is against order dated 6.01.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhadrak in Misc. Case No.101 of 1998 a proceeding under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C., arising out of O.S. No.327 of 1996 rejecting the appellants prayer for substitution.2. The appellant herein is defendant No.17 in the suit and the petitioner in the proceeding under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. The suit is for partition of the suit property and for permanent injunction with ...
M/S. Delhi Foot Wear, Shiv Bazar, Cuttack Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Vigil ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2971 of 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------M/s Delhi Foot Wear, Shiv Bazar, Cuttack ..... Petitioner -VersusSales Tax Officer, Vigilance, Cuttack & others ..... Opposite Parties For petitioner : M/s. P.K.Jena & S.C. Sahoo For Opp. Parties : Mr.R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel [For O.P.-Revenue]. -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 25.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the order of assessment dated 12.01.2007 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-1 Range, Cuttack under Annexure-1 on the ground that the said order is barred by limitation and has been passed without complying with the statutory requirement of Section 42(2) of the OVAT Act. 2 2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that it is a proprietorship concern dealing with Foot Wear on wh...
Satya Prakash Mahana and Others Vs. Rabikanta Singh and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK F.A.O. NOS.161 & 370 OF 2014 From a common order dated 15.3.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baripada in I.A. No.19 of 2014 arising out of C.S. No.72 of 2014. __________ In F.A.O. No.161 of 2014 Satya Prakash Mahana & others Appellants Versus Rabikanta Singh & another For Appellants : For Respondents : Respondents M/s. P.K. Rath, R.N. Parija, A.K. Rout, S.K. Pattnaik, A. Behera & P.K. Sahoo M/s. N. Lenka, A.K. Otta, R. Lenka, H.K. Mahanta, L. Sahu & N. Behera In F.A.O. No.370 of 2014 Rabikanta Singh & another Appellants Versus Satya Prakash Mahana & others For Appellants Respondents : M/s. N. Lenka, H.K. Mahanta, L. Sahu N. Behera & R. Lenka For Respondents : M/s. P.K. Rath, R.N. Parija, A.K. Rout, S.K. Pattnaik, A. Behera & P.K. Sahoo PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 15.09.2014 Date of judgment : 25.09.2014 2 R. DASH, J.Both the appeals arise out of order dated 15.3.2014 passed by the learned C...
M/S. Bengal Tools Limited Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12934 of 2007 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. __________ M/s. Bengal Tools Limited . Petitioner -VersusMahanadi Coalfields Limited and others For the petitioner For the Opp.parties . : Opp. Parties Mr Ashok Mohanty, Senior Advocate, M/s. B.K. Sharma, A.K. Mohapatra, R.K. Sahu and Meetali Jesthi : M/s. Sanjeet Mohanty, N.C. Sahoo, S.Mohanty, R.R. Swain and A.Mohapatra ___________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Decided on : 25.09.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -2- Amitava Roy, C.J.Appalled by the perceived wrongful invocation of the Price Fall Clause contained in the Terms and Conditions governing the transaction of the Belt Conveyors to the opp. party-Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »