Orissa Court April 2014 Judgments
Routa Munda @ Mathura Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK JCRLA No.22 of 2004 From the judgment dated 11.02.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in Sessions Trial No.141 of 1998. Routa Munda @ Mathura Appellant Versus State of Orissa For Appellant Respondent : M/s. B.L. Tripathy, Miss B.P.Tripathy and Miss N.Tripathy For Respondent : Mr. Bishnu Prasad Pradhan, (Addl. Government Advocate) P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Judgment: 30.04.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Biswajit Mohanty, J.This Jail Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.02.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in Sessions Trial No.141 of 1998 convicting the appellant under Section 302 of I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of R...
Tag this Judgment!Satyaranjan Mallick Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK Writ Appeal No.145 of 2014 From the judgment and order dated 29.3.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.26820 of 2013. ----------Satyaranjan Mallick . Appellant Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & others For the Appellant . Respondents Mr.Bibhu Pr.Tripathy, Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K.GOEL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 30.04.2014 : Date of judgment: 30.4.2014 Dr. A.K.Rath, J.This writ appeal has been filed under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent Act against the order dated 29.03.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.26820 of 2013. By the said order the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and, thereby confirmed the decision of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the IOCL), respondent no.4, rejecting the candidature of the appellant for regular LPG distributorship in respect of Betanoti area and consequential selection of respondent no....
Tag this Judgment!Balakrushna Polai Vs. National Bank of Agricultural and Rural Developm ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.12072 of 2012 In The matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------Balakrushna Polai Petitioner - VersusNational Bank of Agricultural and Rural Development, represented through Chairman,Mumbai and others. For Petitioner : For Opp.Parties : Opposite Parties M/s Sandeep Parida and Deepali Mohapatra. Sri J.K.Tripathy,Sr.Advocate, B.P.Tripathy, D.Pradhan, G.S.Das and P.Tripathy. --------- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing: 07.03.2014 :: Date of judgment: 23.04.2014 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------B.K. PATEL, J.In this writ petition, petitioner has made prayer to quash Annexure-10 dated 11.8.2011 by which he was discharged from the services of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) and Annexure-12 dated 15.5.2012 by...
Tag this Judgment!Ajit Ku.Samanta Ray Vs. Soubhagya Ku.Dash
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK REVIEW PETITION NO.52 OF 2014 From the judgment dated 20.02.2014 passed by this Court in F.A.O. No.373 of 2013. __________ Ajit Kumar Samantaray Petitioner Versus Soubhagya Kumar Dash and others For Petitioner Opposite parties : M/s. P.C. Mishra, S.K. Samal & S.K. Giri. For Opposite Parties : M/s. S. Das & M.K. Sahu (For Opposite Party No.1) M/s. S. Mantry, A. Nayak & Sumitra Mohanty (For Opposite Party Nos.2 &3) M/s. P.K. Mishra & S.K. Tripathy (For Opposite Party No.4) PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUBIR DASH Date of hearing : 15.04.2014 R. DASH, J.Date of judgment : 22.04.2014 This review petition under Order-47 Rule-1, C.P.C. is in respect of the judgment dated 20.02.2014 passed by this Court in F.A.O. No.373 of 2013.2. In an appeal against order passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Cuttack in I.A. No.327 of 2013, order of temporary injunction passed by the learned Civil Judge was set aside 2 and the appellant in the F.A...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Bishnupriya Routray
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK F.A.O. NO.86 OF 2013 (From the judgment dated 14.01.2011 passed by Shri P.K. Ray, Presiding Officer, State Education Tribunal, Orissa, Bhubaneswar in G.I.A. Case No.171 of 2008) -------------State of Orissa and another . Appellants Respondents -VersusSmt. Bishnupriya Routray and another For Appellants : Mr. S. Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate For Respondents : M/s. B. Routray, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Mr. S. Das, Mr. S.Jena, Mr. S.K. Samal, Mr. S.P. Nath, Mr. S. Rout. (For Respondent No.1) PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 09.04.2014 :: Date of judgment : 22.04.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.Assailing the order dated 14.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, State Education Tribunal in GIA Case No.171 of 2008, the State of Orissa has preferred this appeal under Section 24C of the Oriss...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. Pradeep Kumar Sahu
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1638 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. __________ Union of India, represented through its Director General, Posts, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 & others Petitioners. -VersusSri Pradeep Kumar Sahoo For petitioner : For Opp. Party : Opposite Party. Mr. S.D.Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India M/s D.P.Dhalasamanta ------------ P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment : 22.04.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.In the present writ petition, challenge has been made to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack (for short, the Tribunal) dated 01.04.2005 passed in O.A. No.52 of 2004 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law.2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that the opposite party Sri Pradeep Kumar Sahoo was appointed prov...
Tag this Judgment!Raktimabha Jena Vs. Dir.of Ayush
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.26896 OF 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------------Raktimabha Jena, represented by her father guardian Petitioner Opp. Parties -VersusDirector of Ayush and four others For Petitioner For Opp. Parties: : M/s. R.K. Patnaik, B. Jally, J.K. Dwibedy and U. Pattnaik Addl. Government Advocate (For O.P.1) M/s. S. Palit, A.K. Mahana, A.Mishra, Miss R. Tripathy & A.Parija (for O.P.2) --------------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.04.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus directing opposite party No.1-Director of Ayush, Government of Odisha, Bhubaneswar to allow the petitioner to take admission in Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery Course (for short BAMS) either at Gopabandhu Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya, Puri or KATS Ayurvedic College, Ank...
Tag this Judgment!Baikuntha Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CASE No.1617 of 2001 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------Sri Nagendra Nath Mohapatra Petitioner Opposite Parties -versusState of Orissa and others For petitioner : M/s.Ramakant Nayak, S.C.Balasamanta For opp. parties : Mr.Trilochan Rath Addl. Standing Counsel (for O.P.1) M/s.B.K.Sahoo, K.C.Sahoo & R.K.Sahoo (for O.P.5) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 03.04.2014 | Date of judgment : 22.04.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The petitioner has filed this application seeking to quash the order of termination dated 4.2.2001 passed by the Honorary Secretary, Utkal Gomangal Samiti, Orissa, Cuttack and to direct to allow him to continue in service till he attains the age of superannuation on 30.9.2002 and to pay reasonable compensation for the loss and damage caused to him due to mental agony. 2 2. The factual matrix of the case at hand is that Utkal Gomangal S...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. Santosh Ku.Rout
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1637 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. __________ Union of India, represented through its Director General, Posts, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 & others Petitioners -VersusSri Santosh Kumar Rout For petitioner : For Opp. Party : Opposite Party Mr. S.D.Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India M/s D.P.Dhalasamanta ------------ P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment : 22.04.2014 B.N.Mahapatra, J.In the present writ petition, challenge has been made to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack (for short, the Tribunal) dated 01.04.2005 passed in O.A. No.53 of 2004 on the ground that the said order is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law.2. Petitioners case in a nutshell is that the opposite party Sri Santosh Kumar Rout was appointed provision...
Tag this Judgment!RahimuddIn Khan Vs. Siraj UddIn Khan
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
R.S.A.No.347 of 2010 Misc. Case Nos.192 & 193 of 2014 08. 22.04.2014 Appellants being the petitioners in both the misc. cases has prayed for an interim injunction restraining the opposite party/respondent from changing the nature and character of the suit property till disposal of the appeal (in Misc. Case No.192 of 2014) and for a direction to the opposite party/respondent to remove the fence over the Plot Nos.114 and 121 and to maintain status quo over the suit property (in Misc. Case No.193 of 2014) Earlier, on the prayer of the petitioners/appellants, order was passed on 10.02.2014 in Misc. Case No.623 of 2013 directing the parties No.to alienate the suit property till disposal of the appeal with specific direction with regard to suit plot No.115 that the parties shall maintain status quo and shall No.make any construction or raise any fence over that plot and in case there is any fence over that plot the same be removed. No.in the present misc. cases petitioners/appellants allege ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »