Orissa Court October 2014 Judgments
Pradeep Kumar Ray Vs. the Director General, Prasar Bharati and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-21-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK OJ.No.10317 OF 2000 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Pradeep Kumar Ray Petitioner Versus The Director General, Prasar Bharati & Others For petitioner Opp. Parties - M/s. K.L. Sharma & G.P. Tripathy, For opp. Parties - Ms. B. Dash, (Opposite party no.2) ------------ PRESENT:THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing: 16.10.2014 : Date of judgment : 21.10.2014 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.By this writ application the petitioner seeks a direction to the opposite parties to declare the Practical Test and interview held at Aakashvani, Cuttack on 22nd December, 1998 for selection to the post of Instrumentalist (Violinist Player), Prasar Bharati, Broadcasting Corporation of India, Aakashvani, Jeypore, Dist- Koraput the same having been made in violation o...
Tag this Judgment!Debarchan Mahanandia Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-21-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK RVWPET No.150 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Order 47, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for review of the judgment of this Court passed on 06.08.2014 in W.P.(C) No.1724 of 2009. ---------Debarchan Mahanandia .. Petitioner -versusState of Orissa & others .. For Petitioner : For Opp.Parties : PRESENT: Opposite Parties M/s. S.K.Purohit, A.K.Nayak P.K.Swain & A.K.Das Mr.A.K.Mishra, Addl.Govt. Advocate (for Opp.Parties 1 to3) _____________ THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing : 14.10.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.:: Date of Judgment: 21.10.2014 The petitioner, who had appeared at the interview conducted by Bamra Trust Fund College for the post of Lecturer in Oriya, has filed this petition for review/ recall of the order dated 6.8.2014 passed in W.P.(C) No.1724 of 2009.2. The short facts of the case are that pursuant to the advertisement issued on 3.1.1995 (Annexure-1), the petitioner and opposite party no.5 appeared at the interview...
Tag this Judgment!Dhabal Prasad Pradhan Vs. State of Odisha and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-21-2014
W.P.(C) No.9997 of 2014 10. 21.10.2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State appearing for the opposite parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has made prayer to direct opposite party no.4-District Sub-Registrar, Cuttack to effect registration of the sale-deed executed by the petitioner in favour of the vendee Akshya Kumar Jena for sale of the case land. Khata No.285 in Mouza-Gopalpur including plot No.1708 stands recorded solely in the name of petitioners vendor Jadunath Behera under Record-ofRights at Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Petitioner purchased land comprising of an area of Ac.0.22 decimals out of plot No.1708 on the strength of registered sale-deed dated 8.2.2013/11.2.2013 at Annexure-2. In order to meet expenses for treatment of his cardiac ailments, the petitioner negotiated with the vendee Akshya Kumar Jena for sale of Ac.0.04 decimals out of the land purchased under sale deed at Annexure-2. While preparing for purchase of stamp ...
Tag this Judgment!Pravata Kumar Tripathy Vs. Union of India (Cbi)
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. BLAPL No.18388 OF 2014 An application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. -------------Pravata Kumar Tripathy .. Petitioner Opp. Party -VersusUnion of India (C.B.I) For Petitioner : For Opp. party: - - M/s. Pitambar Acharya, B.K. Jena, J.P. Parida, Mrs.S.Upadhyay Mr. V.Narasingh ------------P R E S E N T :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO . Date of Argument. 16.10.2014 Date of order- 20.10.2014 . S.K.SAHOO, J.What light is to the eyes- what air is to the lungs what love is to the heart, liberty is to the soul of man.. -Robert Green Ingersoll The petitioner who is a sitting M.L.A. of Banki Assembly Constituency in the Odisha Legislative Assembly has approached this Court in an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. 2 apprehending arrest in connection with CBI/SCB/KOL Case No.RC.47/S/2014-Kol. dated 5.6.2014 registered under sections 120-B,294,341,406,420,467,468,471,506 read with section 34 Indian Penal Code and section 3,4 and...
Tag this Judgment!Damodar Mishra Vs. the East Coast Rail
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
W.P.(C) No.1702 of 2014 06. 16.10.2014 The instant proceeding laid as a PIL registers the demur against the proposed demolition of the unmanned level crossing at Gate No.220-482 Kms/37-39 between Nirakarpur Railway Station and Bhusandpur Railway Station. A direction has been sought for to order the Railway Administration to upgrade the existing unmanned Level Crossing into a manned one in public interest. We have heard Mr.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.Pal, learned counsel for the Railway-opposite party. The petitioners pleaded case is that the existing unmanned level crossing exists for the last 170 years and is the life link of the neighbouring villages located on the eastern and western sides of the railway track and is claimed to be the way used by lakhs of people. Besides agricultural lands around, cattle also move through the railway crossing for their grazing near Chitrakut Hill. That vehicular traffic also ply through the said unmanned level crossing has ...
Tag this Judgment!Coal India Limited and Others Vs. Capt. Hari Sankar Airy
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK WA No.322 of 2014 From an order dated 05.09.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.13570 of 2014. __________ Coal India Limited & others . Appellants -Versus- Capt. Hari Sankar Airy . For the Appellants : For the Respondent : Respondent M/s. S.D. Das, Sr. Advt., M/s. Debraj Mohanty, & A. Mishra M/s. Sameer Kumar Das, S.K. Mishra & P.K. Behera ___________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K. RATH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Decided on : 16.10.2014 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Amitava Roy, C.J.The decision under scrutiny in the instant appeal has been rendered in W.P.(C) No.13570 of 2014 whereby the orders dated 22.07.2014/23.07.2014 transferring/relieving the respondent 2 herein to join the Central Coalfields Limited (for short, hereinafter referred to as the CCL.) under the ...
Tag this Judgment!Aryan Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chief Executive Officer, Wesco Ltd ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK. W.P.(C) NO.31546 of 2011 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------Aryan Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner Versus- Chief Executive Officer, WESCO Ltd. and others Opposite Parties For Petitioner : M/s. Laxmidhar Pangari, A.K.Das, S.K.Mishra, and B.Jena For Opp. Parties : M/s. Pradipta Kumar Mohanty, D.N.Mohapatra, Smt.J.Mohanty, P.K.Nayak, and S.N.Das PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL Date of Hearing: 12.9.2014 :: Date of Judgment 16.10.2014 B.K. PATEL,J.In this writ petition, the petitioner-consumer has made prayer to quash demand notice dated 21.10.2011 as revised by notice dated 25.10.2011 at Annexure-8 series for Minimum Charges issued by the opposite parties representing distribution company WESCO and to direct opposite parties to refund security deposit made by the petitioner under Agreement dated 5.9.2009 at Annexure-2 with interest with effect from 1.8.2011.2. Facts culmina...
Tag this Judgment!Pradipta Ku. Behera Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-15-2014
W.P.(C) No.18721 of 2014 03. 15.10.2014 The eligibility criteria contained in Clause 103(f).sub-clause (i) and (ii) incorporating in the Detail Tender Call Notice (for short DTCN) as an integral component of the Invitation for Bids ( for short IFB) being Bid Identification No.EE/P&IWT(SD)-02/2014-15 is the subject matter of impugnment. Heard Mr.Biswabihari Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.P.Patnaik, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the opposite party. Sans unnecessary details, the facts essential to be stated for the purpose of disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner who claims to be a registered A class P.W.D.Contractor under the Government of Orissa offered his the bid in the process referred to in the aforementioned IFB for the work Construction of Jetty & Waiting Hall (Public Rain Shelter) at Gandakula in Jagatsinghpur District. Three other bidders also participated. However, the bids were cancelled. Prior to the process, the Executive Engi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›