Orissa Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jyotsnasingh@ Jyotsna Aich Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-29-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) Nos. 13994, 794, 13995, 13996, 13998 & 13999 of 2008, W.P. (C) No.1098 of 2009, W.P.(C) No.10232 & 22918 of 2010, W.P.(C) 2634 & 25667 of 2011 W.P.(C) Nos. 5886 & 17502 of 2012 AND W.P.(C) No.9250 of 2005. In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Jyotsnasingh @ Jyotsna Aich (WPC 13994/08) Nihar Ranjan Hati (WPC 794/08) Smt. Prativa Swain (WPC 13995/08 Subhendu Kumar Ray (WPC 13996/08 Jyotsnasingh @ Jyotsna Aich (WPC 13998/08 Krishna Chandra Aich (WPC 13999/08) Sarojini Paramanik and others (WPC 1098/09) Harendra Nath Mohanty (WPC 10232/10) Pratima Rani Mahapatra (WPC 22918/10) Chinmaya Patra (WPC 2634/11) Sri Satyanarayan Satapathy & ors (WPC 25667/11) Dandapani Panda & another (WPC 5886/12) Sri Nilakantha Ghadei (WPC 17502/12) Smt. Sakuntala Parida (WPC 9250/05) . Petitioners (In all) -VersusState of Orissa and others For Petitioners: For opp. parties: . Opp. Parties. (In all) M/s. P.K. Nanda, M...
M/S.Kohinoor Industri Vs. Commissioner
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
W.P.(C) No.17939 of 2013 Present : Mr S. Ray, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr R.P.Kar, Standing Counsel (Revenue).05. 28.01.2014 This petition seeks direction for quashing of the order under Annexures-1 and 13 (which, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, may be read as Annexure-10).The order dated 18.7.2013 (Annexure-10) has been passed by the Dy. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Cuttack-1 West Circle, rejecting the application of the petitioner for amendment of registration by way of addition to the place of business and change of status from proprietorship to partnership. Relevant observations therein are as follows: .On receipt of enquiry report it is also noticed that the additional place of business at Plot No.2099/2242 corresponding to Khata No.747/364, Mouza-Gunjarpur which is mentioned in the amendment application dt. 30.05.2012, partnership deed dt. 30.05.2012 and the certificate issued by Mutarifa Gram Panchayat dt. 07.07.2012 is No.a fact rather vice mutatio...
D.M., Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Laxmi Priya Panda and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK M.A.C.A. Nos. 328 & 818of 2012 From the judgment dated 31.01.2012 passed by Shri S.Mohanty, Member,2nd M.A.C.T. (S.D.), Berhampur in M.A.C. No.239/2011 (318/2006). ----------In M.A.C.A. No.328 of 2012 . . Laxmi Priya Panda and others Appellants -VersusThe Executive Engineer, SOUTHCO, E & M. Division and others . . Respondents For Appellant : M/s.R.P.Mohapatra, & Ms.Deepali Mohapatra For Respondents : M/s.S.S.Parida, K.Mohanty, & S.P.Mangaraj (for Respondent no.1) M/s.Nayan Behari Das & Kailash Ch.Mohanty (for Respondent No.2) In M.A.C.A. No.818 of 2012 D.M., Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. . . Appellant -VersusLaxmi Priya Panda and others . . Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Nayan Behari Das For Respondents : M/s.R.P.Mohapatra, Ms.Deepali Mohapatra & Sandeep Parida (For Respondent Nos.1 to4) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing & judgment : 24.01.2014 2 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.MACA No.328 of 2012 has been filed by the claimants- appellants ch...
Parikshita Chulli. Vs. Chairman,paradip Port
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
W.P.(C) No.1045 of 2014 Present : 02. 24.01.2014 Mr B. Mohanty, Advocate for the petitioner. This petition seeks quashing of tender call notice dated 7.1.2014 (Annexure-1).The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to an earlier tender call notice dated 5.7.2013, the petitioner was found to be the lowest bidder and had legitimate expectation for award of the work, but a decision was taken to discharge the said tender process. According to the petitioner, the said decision is violative of the principles of natural justice. The petitioner made representations, which are No.being considered. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We find from the proceedings of the Tender Committee Meeting dated 31.10.2014 (Annexure-5) that the amount quoted by the petitioner was 91.75% in excess of the estimated cost. The tender authority did No.accept the bid and issued fresh tender. Such a decision can be interfered only if there is illegality or irrationality and No.on the ground that the ...
Laxmi Priya Panda and Others Vs. the Executive Engineer, Southco, E an ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK M.A.C.A. Nos. 328 & 818of 2012 From the judgment dated 31.01.2012 passed by Shri S.Mohanty, Member,2nd M.A.C.T. (S.D.), Berhampur in M.A.C. No.239/2011 (318/2006). ----------In M.A.C.A. No.328 of 2012 . . Laxmi Priya Panda and others Appellants -VersusThe Executive Engineer, SOUTHCO, E & M. Division and others . . Respondents For Appellant : M/s.R.P.Mohapatra, & Ms.Deepali Mohapatra For Respondents : M/s.S.S.Parida, K.Mohanty, & S.P.Mangaraj (for Respondent no.1) M/s.Nayan Behari Das & Kailash Ch.Mohanty (for Respondent No.2) In M.A.C.A. No.818 of 2012 D.M., Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. . . Appellant -VersusLaxmi Priya Panda and others . . Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Nayan Behari Das For Respondents : M/s.R.P.Mohapatra, Ms.Deepali Mohapatra & Sandeep Parida (For Respondent Nos.1 to4) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing & judgment : 24.01.2014 2 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.MACA No.328 of 2012 has been filed by the claimants- appellants ch...
Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Maina Hantal and Anothe ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.402 of 1999 From the judgment dated 25.01.1999 passed by Shri P.B.Patnaik, Member, 2 nd M.A.C.T. (S.D.), Berhampur in M.J.C. No.169 of 2991. ----------Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. . . Appellant -VersusMaina Hantal and another For Appellant . . Respondents : M/s. P.Roy, S.Roy & A.Khan For Respondents : M/s. R.K.Nayak, B.Mohanty & S.Panda (For Respondent No.1) M/s.C.A.Rao, A.K.Rath & P.K.Parida (For Respondent no.2) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing : 08.01.2014 | Date of judgment : Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.24.01.2014 The appellant- Insurance Company has filed this appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, assailing the judgment dated 25.01.1991 passed by the Second Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Berhampur in M.J.C. No.169 of 1991 directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.59,000/- to the claimant-respondent No.1, the wife of the deceased Sulina Gadwa along with interest at the rate of 9% ...
Gurua Naik Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK. FULL BENCH Jail Criminal Appeal No.4 of 2003 From the Reference dated 20.05.2009 by the Division Bench consisting of Honble Sri Justice L. Mohapatra and Honble Sri Justice Pradip Mohanty. ---------- Gurua Naik Appellant Respondent Versus State of Orissa For Appellant : Mr. Gourisankar Pani, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Debasis Panda, Addl. Govt. Advocate. ------------ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K. GOEL, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. DASH AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K. RATH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Hearing : 09.01.2014 Date of Judgment : 24.01.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C.R. Dash, J.This Reference by a Division Bench to the Larger Bench raises the question whether Grama Rakshi is a Police Officer within the meaning of that expressio...
Nirmala Sa Andors.; Vs. Mcl and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
W.P.(C) No.805 of 2013 Present : Mr.P.K.Rath, Advocate for petitioneRs.Mr.S.Mohanty, Advocate for opposite party no.1. Mr.U.K.Samal, Advocate for opposite party nos.3 to 6. 05. 22.01.2014 This petition seeks quashing of the award rendered in pursuance of notice Annexure-1 and direction to the Coal India Limited and Claims Commission No.to disbuRs.the compensation in pursuance of the award. According to the petitioneRs.their property was acquired by Coal India Limited and Claims Commission was constituted for the purpose of determining the quantum of compensation. However, the private opposite parties have tried to withdraw the compensation determined by the Claims Commission. A title suit between the parties is pending before the Civil Judge (Sr.Division).Sundargarh. Notice was issued and direction was also issued No.to disbuRs.the compensation amount upto 31.03.2013. The opposite parties are, Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, Claims Commission and private parties, against whom the petition...
Sri Balaram Dhal Vs. Union of India Rep.Through Its Secy.,railway Boar ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 3033 & 4005 of 2009 & 16706 & 16707 of 2008 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) -----------------------In W.P.(C) No.3033 of 2009 Sri Balaram Dhal Petitioner -Vs- Union of India, represented through its Secretary Railway Board, New-Delhi & others. Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. J.M.Mohanty, K.C.Mishra, P.C.Moharana, M.Pani & R.K.Ray. : M/s. A.K.Misra, S.K.Ojha, N.R.Pandit, H.M.Das & A.K.Sahoo. (For opposite parties). In W.P.(C) No.4005 of 2009 Sri Saroj Kumar Das Petitioner -Vs- Union of India, represented through its Secretary Railway Board, New-Delhi & others. Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. J.M.Mohanty, K.C.Mishra, P.C.Moharana, M.Pani & R.K.Ray. : M/s. A.K.Misra, S.K.Ojha, N.R.Pandit, H.M.Das & A.K.Sahoo. (For opposite parties). 2 In W.P.(C) No.16706 of 2008 Sri Lokanath Mishra Petitioner ...
Sri Saroj Kuar Das Vs. Union of India, Rep.Through Its Secy. Railway B ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 3033 & 4005 of 2009 & 16706 & 16707 of 2008 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) -----------------------In W.P.(C) No.3033 of 2009 Sri Balaram Dhal Petitioner -Vs- Union of India, represented through its Secretary Railway Board, New-Delhi & others. Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. J.M.Mohanty, K.C.Mishra, P.C.Moharana, M.Pani & R.K.Ray. : M/s. A.K.Misra, S.K.Ojha, N.R.Pandit, H.M.Das & A.K.Sahoo. (For opposite parties). In W.P.(C) No.4005 of 2009 Sri Saroj Kumar Das Petitioner -Vs- Union of India, represented through its Secretary Railway Board, New-Delhi & others. Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. J.M.Mohanty, K.C.Mishra, P.C.Moharana, M.Pani & R.K.Ray. : M/s. A.K.Misra, S.K.Ojha, N.R.Pandit, H.M.Das & A.K.Sahoo. (For opposite parties). 2 In W.P.(C) No.16706 of 2008 Sri Lokanath Mishra Petitioner ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »