Orissa Court September 2013 Judgments
M/S. Marine Diesel Service Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and O ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.16667 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------M/s. Marine Diesel Service Petitioner -VersusBharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others For Petitioner For Opp. Parties Opp. Parties : M/s. Goutam Ku. Acharya (Sr. Advocate) B.Das, J.S.Acharya, S.K.Behera, K.Ghadai, R.Naik, & D.K.Naik. : Mr. S.D.Das (Sr. Advocate) Asst. Solicitor General of India --------------- PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY & THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of hearing: 17.09.2013 I. Mahanty, J.Date of judgment: 26.09.2013 The petitioner-M/s. Marine Diesel Service claiming to be a registered firm, registered under the Indian Partnership Act, has filed the present writ application with a prayer seeking direction to the opposite party (Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.) No.to finalise the 2 tender of the petitioner-firm as it is the lowest bidder amongst all the bidders/participant...
Tag this Judgment!Biswanath Palai Vs. Rta,chandikhole
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
W.P.(C) No.22498 o02. 26.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No.OR-04-B/5729 and No.OR-04-B/5730 (Tractor & Trailer) and the opposite party is No.granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 15.10.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 30.10.2013, 15.11.2013 and 30.11.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.installment of...
Tag this Judgment!Pradipta Ku.SwaIn Vs. Rta,cuttack
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
W.P.(C) No.22594 o02. 26.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No.OR-05-AH/0182 and No.OR-05-AH/0183 (Tractor & Trailer) and the opposite party is No.granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 15.10.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 30.10.2013, 15.11.2013 and 30.11.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.installment ...
Tag this Judgment!Hindusthan Lever Limited and Another Vs. the Collector and District Ma ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK. W.P. (C) No.58 of 2003 Arising out of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------------- Hindusthan Lever Limited and another Petitioners Opp. Party Versus The Collector & District Magistrate, Sundargarh For Petitioners : M/s. S.C. Lal, S. Lal and S. Panda. For Opp. Party : Additional Government Advocate. ----------------- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. DASH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Judgment : 25.09.2013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C.R. Dash, J.This writ petition is directed against the order of confiscation dated 07.12.2002 passed by the Collector & District Magistrate, Sundargarh under Section 6(A) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1956 (for short the Act) vide Annexure-9, in Misc. Case No.40 of 2001, directing c...
Tag this Judgment!Bijay Mishra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1219 OF 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Bijay Mishra and others Petitioners -versusUnion of India and others For Petitioners .. Opposite Parties : M/s. Bijan Ray, B. Mohanty, S. Mohanty, D. Chhotray, D.R. Das & B. Moharana. For Opp. Parties : Mr. S.D. Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India, (for opposite party no.1) : Mr. Ramesh Ch. Swain (for opposite party no.2) : Additional Government Advocate (for opposite party nos.3 to5) : M/s. G. Rath, Senior Advocate, S. Rath & B.K. Nayak. (for opposite party no.6) : Mr. S.K. Padhi, Senior Advocate, (for opposite party no.7) : Mr. S.P. Panda & R.R. Swain. (for opposite party no.8) P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Hearing: 12.08.2013 : Date ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Niranjan Sethi Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK RVWPET NOS.24 & 25 OF 2013 --------------From the common judgment dated 21.12.2012 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) Nos. 24106 and 24325 of 2011. Shri Niranjan Sethi (in both the cases) Petitioner -versusUnion of India and others (in both the cases) For Petitioner Opposite Parties : Mr. Ganeswar Rath, Senior Advocate (in both the cases) For Opp. Parties : Mr. S.D. Das, Asst. Solicitor General of India, (for opposite party nos.1 & 2 in both cases) : Additional Government Advocate (for opposite party nos.3 to 5 in both the cases) : Mr. S.K. Padhi, Senior Advocate, S.K. Singh & Miss. S. Das, T.K. Kamila (for opposite party no.6 in RVWPET No.24 of 2013 & opposite party no.7 in No.25 of 2013) RVWPET : M/s. Shakti Prasad Panda & R.R. Swain (for opposite party no.6 in RVWPET No.25 of 2013) P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY ----------------------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!iswar Ch.Mahanta Vs. Rto,keonjhar
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
W.P.(C) No.21873 o02. 24.09.2013 Heard learned learned Standing counsel for the petitioner and Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing Registration Nos.OR-09-B/6073 & OR-09-B/6074 (Tractor Trolly) and the opposite party is No.granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 09.10.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 24.10.2013, 08.11.2013 and 23.11.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.instalment of the penalty, the p...
Tag this Judgment!Radhakanta Mohanty Vs. Rta,chandikhole
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-24-2013
W.P.(C) No.22271 o02. 24.09.2013 Heard learned learned Standing counsel for the petitioner and Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing Chassis No.1713838 and Engine No.4H.2295/1029053 (JCB) and the opposite party is No.granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 09.10.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 24.10.2013, 08.11.2013 and 23.11.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.instalment of the penalty, the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Radhakanta Mohanty Vs. Rto,chandikhole
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
W.P.(C) No.22099 o02. 20.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing Chassis No.1713698 and Engine No.4H.2295/1028982 (JCB) and the opposite party is not granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 05.10.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 21.10.2013, 05.11.2013 and 20.11.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.installment of the penalty, the petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Snehalata Jagati, Bhubaneswar Vs. Convenor, Pg (Medical/Dental) Select ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.20557 OF 201.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------Snehalata Jagati, D/o Bansidhar Jagati, W/o Dr.Rajash Padhi, Resident of HIG-5/2, BDA Colony, PS: Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Dist: Khurda Petitioner -VersusConvenor, PG (Medical/Dental) Selection Committee, Odisha and others For Petitioner : For Opp. Parties : Opp. parties M/s. Suvashish Pattnaik, S.Mohanty, B.Moharana, B.Mohanty, A.Barik & M.Mohanty Mr. R.C. Mohanty [For O.P. Nos.1 to 3]. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of judgment:20. 09.2013 B.N.Mahapatra, J.This writ application has been filed with a prayer to declare action of opposite party No.1 not allowing the petitioner to participate in the second round of counseling in spite of deposit of all the required documents as illegal and with further prayer to issue necessary direction to opposite parties to admit the petitioner in PG (M...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »