Orissa Court September 2013 Judgments
Sobhagini Tripathy Vs. Subhashini Tripathy and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.325 of 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Sobhagini Tripathy . Petitioner Versus Subhashini Tripathy & Others For petitioner . Opp.Parties : Mr. Digambar Mishra. For Opp. Parties : M/s T.Nanda & K.Dash for Opp. Party No.1. M/s Gurudatta Kar, A.Mohanty & J.Behera for Opp. Party No.2 M/s Arun Kr. Mishra, T.Mishra & K.K.Mohapatra for Opp. Party No.3. P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 20.09.2013 Date of Judgment: 30.09.2013 ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K.Rath,J.The seminal question that hinges for my consideration is as to whether power of attorney holder of a party is entitled to appear as a witness on behalf of the said party?.2. Opposite party No.1 as plaintiff laid a suit in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bolangir for a declaration that she is entitled to 1/4th share over the Schedule-...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Divisional Office, Vs. Smt. Sunita Nai ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK M.A.C.A. No.590 of 2007 From an Award dated 09.05.2007 passed by Shri S.P.Sarangi, Member, 2nd Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Northern Division, Sambalpur passed in Misc. (A) Case No.267 of 2002(S). ----------------- United India Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional office, AT/PO: Sambalpur Appellant. -VersusSmt. Sunita Naik and others Respondents. For Appellant : M/s A.K.Mohanty, Sr. Advocate M.C.Nayak & D.C.Dey For Respondents : M/s D.Pati, S.K.Mishra & S.N.Sharma (For R-1 to4) ----------- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 27.09.2013 B.N.Mahapatra, J.This appeal has been directed at the instance of the United India Insurance Company Limited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the Award dated 09.05.2007 passed by the Member, 2nd Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), Northern Division, Sambalpur in Misc. (A) Case No.267 of 2002(S).2. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, who ...
Tag this Judgment!Khetrabasi Rout Vs. C.V.Ramesh Babu
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
M.A.C.A.NO.653 O12. 27.9.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal by the claimants-appellants is directed against the award dated 7.5.2007, passed by the learned 1st Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Cuttack, in Misc.Case No.758 of 2004, awarding an amount of Rs.89,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum, from the date of filing of the claim application, i.e., 20.01.2005, till realization. The sole contention raised by the learned counsel for the claimants-appellants is that the deceased being admittedly an unmarried girl, the age of her parents, who are claimants 1 and 2, should have been taken as the basis for calculating the compensation amount payable. It is submitted that the learned Tribunal has erroneously taken the age of the deceased and her prospect of her marriage as the basis for calculating the compensation amount payable, which, according to the learned counsel for the appellants, is No.permissible in law. It is accordingly submitted that as ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajya Sainik Board, Odisha Vs. Rajashree Nayak
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.A. Nos.386 & 389 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Clause-10 of the Latter Patent read with Chapter-III, Rule-6 of the Rules of the High Court of Orissa -------------W.A. No.386 of 2013 Chairman, Odisha Joint Entrance Examination Committee. . Appellant . Respondent -VersusRajashree Nayak For Appellant : M/s. S. Palit, A.K.Mahana, A. Mishra, R.Tripathy, A. Parija. For Respondent : M/s. A.Mohapatra(Sr.Advocate). W.A. No.389 of 2013 Rajya Sainik Board, Odisha . Appellant . Respondent -VersusRajashree Nayak For Appellant : M/s. D.K. Sahoo-1 & B.K.Behera. For Respondent : M/s. A.Mohapatra (Sr.Advocate) T. Das, S.S.Mohapatra, S.K.Mishra, S.K.Barik, S.Samal,S.P.Mangaraj & S.Nath. 2 --------------P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY. & THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA. Date of hearing: 25.09.2013 I. Mahanty, J.Date of Judgment: 27.09.2013 The aforesaid writ appeals have been filed by the Chairman, Orissa Joint Entrance Exam...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Sarada Devi, Cuttack Vs. Cuttack Development Authority
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2456 of 2004 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------Smt. Sarada Devi, aged about 62 years, W/o. Late Ramniwas Chetani, C/o. Shree Bhartya Bihar, Near Pravat Cinema Hall, At: Buxibazar, Town/Dist: Cuttack Petitioner Opp. Party -VersusCuttack Development Authority For Petitioner : M/s. Bidyadhar Mishra, K. Mishra & G. Agarwal For Opp. Party : Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra [For Cuttack Development Authority]. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I. MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 27.09.2013 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing opposite partyCuttack Development Authority to issue final allotment order to the petitioner and handover possession of Plot No.83-C/464 in Sector-8, Bidanasi Project Area allotted in her favour within a specified time.2. Petitione...
Tag this Judgment!Centurion University of Technology and Management, R Vs. State of Odis ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C). NO.10717 OF 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------Centurion University of Technology and Management, represented through Pro-Vice Chancellor, Ardhendu Mouli Mohanty, aged about 60 years, S/o. Raj Kishore Mohanty, At: Ramchandrapur, P.O. Jatani, Dist: Khurda Petitioner Opp.Parties -VersusState of Odisha and others For Petitioner : Mr. Y. Das, Senior Advocate, M/s. Rajjeet Roy & S.K. Singh For Opp. Parties : Mr. Satya Sundar Das, [For O.P. Nos.2 and 3]. Mr. S.K. Samal, [For O.P. No.1-SME]. ---------- P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment : 27.09.2013 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This Writ Petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing letter dated 13.08.2012 issued by opposite party No.1-Special Secretary to Government, Department of School and Mass Education (Annexure-15), letter dated 29.11.2012 issued by opposite party No.2-Eastern Regional Committee,...
Tag this Judgment!Chairman, Odisha Joint Entrance Examination Commit Vs. Rajashree Nayak
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.A. Nos.386 & 389 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Clause-10 of the Latter Patent read with Chapter-III, Rule-6 of the Rules of the High Court of Orissa -------------W.A. No.386 of 2013 Chairman, Odisha Joint Entrance Examination Committee. . Appellant . Respondent -VersusRajashree Nayak For Appellant : M/s. S. Palit, A.K.Mahana, A. Mishra, R.Tripathy, A. Parija. For Respondent : M/s. A.Mohapatra(Sr.Advocate). W.A. No.389 of 2013 Rajya Sainik Board, Odisha . Appellant . Respondent -VersusRajashree Nayak For Appellant : M/s. D.K. Sahoo-1 & B.K.Behera. For Respondent : M/s. A.Mohapatra (Sr.Advocate) T. Das, S.S.Mohapatra, S.K.Mishra, S.K.Barik, S.Samal,S.P.Mangaraj & S.Nath. 2 --------------P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY. & THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.MAHAPATRA. Date of hearing: 25.09.2013 I. Mahanty, J.Date of Judgment: 27.09.2013 The aforesaid writ appeals have been filed by the Chairman, Orissa Joint Entrance Exam...
Tag this Judgment!Biswanath Mohanty and Another Vs. Kailash Ch. Mohanty and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK CRLMC No.1584 of 2011 In the matter of an application under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. ---------Biswanath Mohanty and another Petitioners Opposite Party -versusKailash Ch. Mohanty and others For petitioners : M/s. Prabodh Ku. Pattnaik, M.K.Mishra, A.K.Mohanty S.K.Pattnaik & A.Panda. For opp. parties : M/s.Surkanta Dash, Hara Krushna Moharana (for opp. Parties 1 to5) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 12.09.2013 | Date of judgment : 27.09.2013 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The petitioners, who are the first party members, in a proceeding under Section 147, Cr.P.C., have filed this application assailing the order dated 6.1.2011 passed by the learned Ad hoc Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Jajpur in Criminal Revision No.57 of 2009 setting aside the order dated 16.10.2009 passed by the Executive Magistrate, Jajpur in Crl.Misc. Case No.272 of 2008.2. The fact of the case is that the first party members, petitioners herein, are...
Tag this Judgment!Kamalakanta Modi and Another Vs. State of Orissa and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK CRLMC No.167 of 2002 In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ---------Kamalakanta Modi and another Petitioners -versusState of Orissa and others For petitioners For opp. parties : : Opposite Parties M/s. K.K. Jena, A.K. Biswal & A.K. Behera. Mr. Zafarullah, Addl. Standing Counsel (opposite party no.1) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.05.09.2013 & Date of Judgment: 27.09.2013 This CRLMC has been directed against the order dated 17.5.2002 passed by the learned Adhoc Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Balasore in Criminal Revision No.70/2001 of 6/1998 confirming the order dated 5.1.1998 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Balasore in I.C.C. Case No.113 of 1997 in which cognizance of offence under Sections 363/376/109, IPC was taken. 2 2. The short fact is that on 19.5.1996, Bhanja Parmanik, the father of the victim Sanjulata Parmanik lodged an F.I.R. before the Town P.S.,...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Sri Jagannath Mahaprabhu Bije Puri, Rep. by Th Vs. Radha Pankaj Da ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C.NO.7793 OF 1998 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) -----------------------Sr.SriJagannath Mahaprabhu Bije Puri, represented by the Administrative Officer. Petitioner -versus Radha Pankaj Das and others Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/S.B.Rath, S.K.Mishra, B.Senapti, J.Rath, P.S.Samantra, P.K.Panda, M.K.Panda, S.K.Jethy & S.B.Mohanty. : M/S.N.K.Sahoo, A.K.Parida and M.K.Nayak (For opposite party No.1) Addl. Government Advocate (For opposite party Nos.10 to 12).------------------------------ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE S.PANDA AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of Judgment : S.Panda, J. 27.9.2013 Petitioner, in the present writ application, has challenged the order passed by opposite party Nos.10 to 12 in a proceeding under Orissa Estate Abolition Act rejecting the prayer of the petitioner to settle the land in favour of the petiti...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »