Orissa Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Management of M/S.Mi. Vs. P.O,industrial Tribunal
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-13-2013
W.P.(C) No.18342 o02. 13.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed by the Management challenging the order dated 19.07.2013, passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in I.D.Case No.45 of 2011 (Annexure-6).rejecting the petitioners application for deciding three issues as preliminary issues fiRs.before hearing on the other issues. The case of the petitioner-Management in brief is that a reference was made by the State Government to the Industrial Tribunal, Bhubaneswar, for adjudication of the following dispute: Whether the action of Management of M/S.MESCO steels LTD.in terminating the services of Sr.Sahadev Mohapatra w.e.f.10.7.2006 is legal and/or justified ?. If not to what relief Sr.Mohapatra is entitled to ?.. After submission of the statement of claim by the workman-opposite party no.2 and written statement filed by the petitioner-Management, learned Tribunal framed the following issues: i) Whether the reference is maintainable ?. ii) ...
Pradyumna Ku.Sarangi Vs. Rto,cuttack
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
W.P.(C) No.18310 o02. 12.08.2013 Heard learned learned Standing counsel for the petitioner and Counsel appearing for the Transport Department. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing Registration not OR-05-AJ-2873 (Tata ACE Magic) and the opposite party is not granting permit and fitness certificate in respect of the said vehicle as the petitioner is in default of paying tax and penalty for some period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the tax, but the penalty amount being excessive, the same may be reduced. Considering the submissions made, it is directed that if the petitioner pays the tax demanded by 27.08.2013 and undertakes before the opposite party to pay 60% of the penalty amount in three equal consecutive instalments, i.e., by 11.09.2013, 26.09.2013 and 10.10.2013, then on payment of tax and the fiRs.instalment of the penalty, the petitioners ap...
Mamata Patra Vs. S.D.O.,nesco
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
W.P.(C) No.8596 o09. 12.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed prying for a direction to the opposite parties to restore electricity connection to the petitioners premises in question. During couRs.of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the premises in question has been purchased by the present petitioner by a registered sale deed and that the existing electricity connection to the premises is continuing in the name of the previous owner. It is submitted that electricity bills are being paid by the petitioner in the name of the previous owner. It is further submitted that as there are some arrear dues outstanding against the previous owner, the opposite parties are not ready and willing to transfer the existing electricity connection in the name of the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer has been made to permit the petitioner to file an application for fresh connection to the premises in question, which may be considered by ...
Krushna S.Behera Vs. State and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
W.P.(C) NO.18390 OF 201.2. 12.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate.2. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dtd.11.7.2013 passed by the Tahasildar, Jatni in Misc. Case No.30 of 2012 under Section 3-B of the O.G.L.S Act, 1962 setting aside the order of settlement made in favour of the original lessee-late Abhaya Kumar Pattnaik in W.L Case No.170 of 1980.3. On perusal of records, it appears that the Tahasildar, Jatni after going through the materials available on record, by the impugned order came to the conclusion that the principles regulating grant of concession of land as laid down in the resolutions issued by the Government in Home Department and erstwhile Revenue and Excise Department have been grossly violated. The original lessee has violated the terms and conditions of the lease and suppressed material facts before the Court. The then Tahasildar, Jatni with a malafide intention initiated the cas...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›