Orissa Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Ushadevi Sukhani Vs. Cuttack Development Authority and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.13932 OF 201.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------Smt. Ushadevi Sukhani Petitioner -VersusCuttack Development Authority, and others. For Petitioner Opp. parties : M/s. Dr. A.K.Rath, A.K.Nath & H.P. Mohanty. For opp. parties : M/s. Dayananda Mohapatra, M.Mohapatra, G.R. Mohapatra, A. Dash & S.Mallick. (For O.Ps 1 & 2). ----------------------Decided on 30 .01.2013 -------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE C.R. DASH M. M. DAS, J.The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for quashing the order dated 16.4.2012 passed by the Planning Member, Cuttack Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the C.D.A.) opp. party No.3 vide Annexure-4 and for a direction to accord permission to the petitioner for construction of a residential C.D.A. house over the plot allotted to her by th2. Facts of the case disclose that p...
Aswini Kumar Das Vs. the Executive Engineer, Balasore Electrical Divn.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO.14225 OF 201.(In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) -----------------------Aswin Kumar Das Petitioner -Vs- The Executive Engineer, Balasore Electrical Division and another Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioner : : For Opp. Parties M/s.Gautam Mukherji, Partha Mukherji, Anam Charan Panda and Supriya Patra M/s Rajjeet Roy, S.K.Singh, N.Hota and A.Pradhan -----------------------------PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE S.PANDA Date of Hearing : S.Panda, J.21.1.2013 : Date of Judgment :30. 1.2013 This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the action of the opposite parties-NESCO in No.paying the benefit of 3rd Assured Career Progression (A.C.P) in the revised scale and corresponding pension to the petitioner as well as the memorandum and decision of the Screening Committee dtd.03.5.2010 under Annexure-7.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner en...
Praxair India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sub-collector and Sub-divisional Magistrat ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK W.P. (C) No.2611 of 2012 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. --------------Praxair India Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner Versus Sub-Collector and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Angul and others. For petitioner - For opposite parties - Opposite parties M/s. Pami Rath, C.Muralidhar, I.Mohanty and Mr.R.K.Rath (Sr. Advocate) Addl. Government Advocate (for opp.party no.1) and M/s. Manoranjan Das and P.P.Mohanty (for opp.party no.2). --------------PRESENT THE HONOURABLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K.MISHRA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of judgment - 29th January, 2013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------S.K.Mishra, J.In this case, the petitioner company has prayed for a direction to the opposite parties to accept the status of deemed grant ...
Bansidhar Jena and Others Vs. State of Orissa Rep.Through Collector, P ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-18-2013
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. F.A. NO.350 of 1990 From the judgment and decree dated 28.6.1990 passed by Shri S.K. Pradhan, Subordinate Judge, Bhubaneswar in Title Suit No.165 of 1984. Bansidhar Jena and others Appellants Respondents - VersusState of Orissa, represented through Collector, Puri and another For Appellants : Sri Banamali Mohanty, Bidhayak Patnaik and M. Badu For Respondents : Advocate General and Addl. Standing Counsel --------PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL Date of hearing 20.12.2012 :: B.K. PATEL, J.Unsuccessful judgment and Subordinate decree Judge Date of judgment 18.1.2013 plaintiffs dated (not are in 28.6.1990 Civil Judge appeal against passed (Senior by the learned Division), Bhubaneswar in Title Suit No.165 of 1984, a suit for declaration of occupancy status over the suit land or, in alternative, for declaration of right, title and interest over the suit land by adverse possession2. Plaintiffs case is that the suit land originally appertained ...
Sri Shiba Prasad Das Vs. Vysa Teli Jatiya Samiti, Cuttack
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.31330 OF 201.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Sri Shiba Prasad Das Petitioner Opp. party -VersusVysa Teli Jatiya Samiti, Cuttack For Petitioner : M/s. For opp. party : Mr. Banshidhar Baug, M.R.Baug & S.Rath. S.C. Samantray. ----------------------Decided on 16.01.2013 -------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS M. M. DAS, J.The opposite party, as plaintiff, has filed C.S. No.86 of 2010 (III) before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ist Court, Cuttack with the following reliefs:(i) Let the defendant be directed to pay the house rent at the rate of Rs. 950/- per the month from Nove.2007 to 30.9.2008, till the termination of tenancy; (ii) Let a money decree be passed directing defendant to pay damages for his unauthorise occupation from Ist Oct. 2008 to end of Jan. 2010 at the rate of Rs. 950/-, thus, a money decree for Rs. 25,650/- as per Sc...
Hari Priya Sahoo Vs. Jagar Sahoo and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.15170 of 2010 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Hari Priya Sahoo. Petitioner -VersusJagar Sahoo and others For Petitioner : M/s. For opp. parties: M/s. Opp. parties B.K.Dagara & P.K. Patnaik. S.K.Mohanty, B.K. Parija, B.Behera & A.K.Rout. -----------------------------------Date of Judgment:16. 01.2013 -----------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in C.S. No.118 of 2007 M. M. Das, J.filed in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kendrapara has called in question the order dated 16.8.2010 passed in the said suit by which the learned trial court has held that the suit abates under section 4 (4) of the Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972 (for short, the Act).2. The suit was originally filed by the petitioner for a decree for permanent injunction rest...
Rail Vikash Nigam Ltd. (Rvnl) and Another Vs. Harish Chandra (India) L ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. ARBA No.29 OF 201.In the matter of an Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. ----------Rail Vikash Nigam Ltd. (RVNL) &another Appellants -VersusHarish Chandra (India) Ltd. and another Respondents. For Appellants : M/s. R.K. Mohanty, A.K. Mishra, H.M. Dash and A.K. Sahoo. For Respondents: M/s. M. Mohapatra, L.N. Sahoo, P.K. Routray, S. Mohanty & R.P. Kar ----------------------Decided on 16 .01.2013 --------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS M. M. DAS, J.This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred by the appellants, i.e., Rail Vikash Nigam Ltd. (RVNL in short), which is a Government of India Company, and another challenging the order dated 11.10.2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar. The impugned order has been passed in an application filed by the respondents 2 under Section 9 of th...
Shri Prafulla Kumar Nayak Vs. State of Odisha and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.20243 OF 201.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Shri Prafulla Kumar Nayak Petitioner Opp. parties -VersusState of Odisha and others For Petitioner : M/s. M.S. Rizvi & A.K. Patnaik. For opp. parties : M/s. B.P.Tripathy (for O.P.No.5) . ----------------------Decided on 10 .01.2013 --------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M.DAS AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE C.R.DASH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ M.M.Das,J.The opposite party No.5 Management, i.e., HINDALCO Industries Limited, entered its appearance through Mr. B.P. Tripathy, Advocate, who filed the Vakalatnama.2. The petitioner is the General Secretary of HINDALCO Staff Association, who has filed this writ petition to declare the references under Annexures 1 series made by the Government of Odisha, in its Labour and ESI Department under Secti...
Md. MoinuddIn Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhubaneswar and Ano
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. W.P.(C). No.12718 OF 200.In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ----------Md. Moinuddin Petitioner Opp. parties -VersusPresiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhubaneswar and another. For Petitioner : M/s. S.S.Das, K.C.Mohapatra & R.K.Sahoo. For opp. parties: M/s. Dr.A.K. Rath & A.Panda. (For O.P.2) -----------------------------------Date of Judgment:10. 01.2013 -----------------------------------PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.M. DAS M. M. Das, J.The petitioner challenging the order dated 24.03.2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhubaneswar, Orissa in I.D. Case No.28 of 2003 has preferred the present writ application seeking quashing of the said order and for issuing a direction to the opposite party no.2-Management to reinstate/re-engage the petitioner with immediate effect by restoring his position in the merit list and granting him back-wages and other consequential benefits.2. The fact...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›