Orissa Court January 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rama Chandra Mallik Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-05-2010
Reported in: 2010(I)OLR506
S.K. Mishra, J.1. In this Revision, petitioner assails his conviction under Section 47(a) and (f) of Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1947 by the learned J.M.S.C., Puri on 30.04.1998 in 2(a) C.C. No. 129 of 1994, which has been confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Puri in Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1998 as per the judgment dated 22.09.2001.2. In short, case of the prosecution is that on 26.02.1994, the S.I. of Excise, Puri Sadar searched the house of the accused situated at Sunapada (Hadiabandha) and recovered one plastic Jar containing four litres of I.D. liquor and six earthen pots, each containing 20 litres of fermented 'gurh' wash. The Excise Officer conducted blue litmus paper test and hydrometer test, seized the recovered articles, collected sample from the same and placed the prosecution report against the accused under Section 47(a) and (f) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). In course of trial, the defence took the plea of denial.Pros...
Bikram Ray Vs. Smt. Jema Hembram and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-05-2010
Reported in: 2010(I)OLR443
S.K. Mishra, J.1. In this Revision, petitioner i.e. opposite party in C.M.C. No. 57 of 2001 of the Court of S.D.J.M., Karanjia has assailed the partly reversing judgment of the learned Adhoc Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Baripada in Criminal Revision No. 3/37 of 2005/04.2. Succinctly stated, case of the petitioner No. 1 before the trial Court is that on 05.03.2000 as per caste custom, she married the opposite party i.e. the present petitioner and stayed with him for a period of seven to eight months in his house as his wife and out of their wedlock on 15.06.2001, she gave birth to petitioner No. 2. It is further alleged that after the birth of petitioner No. 2, her father i.e., the present petitioner and his family members started torturing petitioner No. 1 both mentally and physically and did not give her any food, cloth and medicine. Finally on 15.07.2001, he drove her away. Thereafter, she is staying in her parents' house along with her minor daughter. Her hus...
Krushna Chandra Das and ors. Vs. the Chairman, Ctc Gramya Bank and ors ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-04-2010
Reported in: 109(2010)CLT242
A.S. Naidu, J.1. The Petitioners are the employees of Cuttack Gramya Bank, in short, 'Bank', a statutory body constituted under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. The dispute relates to their promotions to the post of Field Supervisor.2. Sworn of unnecessary details, it would be trite to state the facts in brief so as to appreciate the inter-se disputes.Admittedly, the Petitioners after facing rigorous recruitment test were appointed in the Bank as Junior Clerks in the year 1981. On 20.6.1983 they were promoted to the post of Senior Clerk-cum-Cashier. In the year 1982-83, sixty posts of Field Supervisor fell vacant. Out of the said posts, the Bank authorities considering their financial position, took a decision to fill up the said posts, phase-wise. Consequently, in the year 1983, 27 eligible employees, who were working as Senior Clerk-cum-Cashier of the Bank, were promoted to the post of Field Supervisors. Similarly, in the year 1984 six more Senior Clerk-cum-Cashiers were also prom...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›