Orissa Court July 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Prabalakanti Jana Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-02-2008
Reported in: 106(2008)CLT760
I.M. Quddusi, C.J.1. These are two review petitions filed against the common Judgment/ order passed on 4.5.2006 in the three Writ Petitions i.e. W.P.(C) Nos. 9262, 9839 of 2004 and 687 of 2005.2. W.P.(C) No. 9262 of 2004 was filed by Sri Tarak Nath Sasmal who is Petitioner in Review Petition No. 101 of 2006 and W.P.(C) No. 9839 of 2004 was filed by Sri Prabalakanti Jana, Petitioner in Review Petition No. 100 of 2006. The Writ Petitions were filed for a direction to Member Secretary, Orissa State Board of Pharmacy, Bhubaneswar to declare their results and issue certificates of Diploma in Pharmacy in their favour.3. The brief facts of the case are that after completing their higher secondary-studies, they submitted applications in prescribed form for admission to Diploma in Pharamacy course in Pharmacy Colleges of Orissa for the year 2000-01 and after considering their applications and being satisfied with their eligibility, they were directed to take admission in Sidheswar College of Ph...
Krushna Ch. Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-02-2008
Reported in: 106(2008)CLT846
I.M. Quddusi, A.C.J.1. This Writ Petition has been filed against the impugned Judgment/ order passed on 8th July, 1997 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 236 of 1997 filed by the Petitioner.2. The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner was appointed as an Assistant in Central Tobacco Research Institute (in short 'C.T.R.I.') on 14.9.1983 whereas the Opposite Party No. 3 was appointed on the post of Assistant on 9.10.1984 in the office of the C.T.R.I. Similarly, the Petitioner was appointed on deputation on the post of Superintendent (Admn.) in the Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (in short 'C.I.F.A') on 10.3.1989 whereas the Opposite Party No. 3 joined on deputation on the post of 1992, the permanent absorption of the deputationists was considered but the Petitioner did not exercise his option and, therefore, the permanent absorption of Opposite Party No. 3 who had exercised option was made.3. In the absence of the option, the ...
Kabiraj Sethi Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-01-2008
Reported in: 2008(II)OLR579
B.K. Patel, J.1. By the judgment passed in 2(a) C.C. Case No. 5 of 1993 (Trl. No. 76 of 1993) by the learned S.D.J.M., Hindol, the petitioner was convicted for commission of offence under Section 47 (f) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo R.I. for one month. In the impugned judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal-Angul, Dhenkanal in Criminal Appeal No. 86 of 1993, the conviction of the petitioner was upheld but the sentence was modified and reduced to the extent that the petitioner would undergo R.I. for one month and pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo R.I. for one month. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred this revision challenging the order of conviction.2. Prosecution was launched against the petitioner on the allegation that P.W.1, the S.I. of Excise, Hindol while performing patrolling duty, on getting reliable information, conducted search of the h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›