Orissa Court June 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abhimanyu Pradhan Vs. Trilochan Rout and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-20-2006
Reported in: 102(2006)CLT621
P.K. Tripathy, J.1. Abhimanyu Pradhan, petitioner in W.P.(C) 8183 of 2003 and Trilochan Rout, Petitioner in W.P.(C) 8281 of 2003 were two rival candidates contesting for the post of Panchayat Samiti Member from Belipada Samity Constituency under Banki-Dompara Panchayat Samiti. For the sake of convenience Abhumanyu Pradhan is described as the petitioner and Trilochan Rout as Opp. Party No. 1. The said post was notified on 7.1.2002. Nominations were scrutinized on 22.1.2002 and election was held on 27.2.2002. Opp. Party No. 1 was declared elected on securing majority of the votes. At the time of scrutiny of the nominations, petitioner raised objection to the candidature of the Opp. Party No. 1, but such objection was rejected by the Election Officer (Opp. Party No. 2). After declaration of result, petitioner filed Election Misc. Case No. 6 of 2002 before the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum-Election Commissioner, Banki in accordance with the provision in Section 44-A red with Section 44...
Maharagu Naik and Smt. Sumitra Mahanandia Vs. Civil Judge, Senior Divi ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-20-2006
Reported in: 102(2006)CLT710
P.K. Tripathy, J.1. Both the writ petitions were heard for their disposal at the stage of admission because of availability of the L.C.R. (being called for). Though the election petitioners in each of the cases is different but on verbal request of the counsel for the petitioners and consent of the opposite party, argument was heard combinedly and this judgment shall abide the result in both the writ petitions, though dealt with separately.2. Tara @ Rita Behera, wife of Dingar Behera was elected as a Member of Boudh Panchayat Samiti from Mundipadar Grama Panchayat Constituency. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter she is described as opposite party No. 1. Maharagu Naik was one of the contesting candidates from the said Grama Panchayat Constituency. After being defeated in the election he filed M.J.C. No. 13 of 2002 in the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Boudh under Section 45-A read with Section 45-B of the Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 (in short 'the Act'). Opposite party...
Ajay Kumar Sahoo and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-20-2006
Reported in: 1(2007)ACC488
P.K. Tripathy, J.1. Since all the aforesaid three writ petitions, on consent of the parties, were heard analogously, being involving common question of law, such writ petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.2. In W.P. (C) No. 6070 of 2003 case of the petitioner is that he is a State carriage operator within the State. The opposite parties 2 to 4 i.e., State Transport Authority, Orissa, Chairman, State Transport Authority, Orissa, and Secretary, State Transport Authority, Orissa together with the opposite parties 6 and 7, i.e., the Chairman, State Transport Authority, West Bengal and Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal, who are the countersigning authorities, are illegally grating temporary stage carriage permits in breach of the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short 'the Act') and more particularly provision in Section 88(1) of the said Act. Petitioners' further case is that both the State Governments are deliberately not determining the routes to be ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›