Orissa Court May 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Smt. Tunirani Das and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-08-2006
Reported in: 101(2006)CLT785
I.M. Quddusi, J.1. Heard Mr. J.K. Mishra, Learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for the petitioners and Mr. S.P. Mohanty, Learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 1.2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners against the judgment and order dated 20.1.2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 234 of 2002 which was filed by opposite party No. 1 against the rejection of her case for compassionate appointment and for a direction to the authority concerned to provide compassionate appointment in her favour. The Tribunal allowed the O.A., quashed order rejecting the case of the O.P. No. 1 which was impugned therein and further directed the petitioners to provide a compassionate appointment (Group-D post) to the opposite party No. 1 by granting necessary relaxation in qualification, if any, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copies of its order.3. We had also summoned the concerned record, which ha...
Santosh Kumar Sahoo Vs. Authorised Officer-cum-asst. Conservator of Fo ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-08-2006
Reported in: 2006(II)OLR78
ORDER1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ application has been filed challenging the order dated 5.3.2005 passed by the District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar in M.A. No. 79 of 2000 (Annexure-9) confiscating the vehicle bearing Registration number OR-05-E-5657. The appellate authority has confirmed the order passed by the Authorized Officer. The only point raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioner in this proceeding is that before confiscating the vehicle in question, no notice was given to the owner of the vehicle - Shri Santosh Kumar Sahoo.3. We find from the record that such a question was also raised, both before the Authorized Officer and the appellate authority, but none of them considered the said question in its proper perspective having regard to the facts of the case. It appears that on 5.5.2000 the writ petition filed by Santosh Kumar Sahoo (present petitioner) for interim release of the said vehicle was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court wi...
Nihar Ranjan Bisoi Vs. Election Tribunal-cum-district Judge and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(I)OLR796
R.N. Biswal, J.1. The petitioner assails the order dated 1.8.2005 passed by the District Judge, Koraput, Jeypore in election Petition No. 4 of 2003 wherein he ordered for recounting of the ballot papers.2. The petitioner was opp.party No. 1 and opp.party No. 3 was the petitioner in the aforesaid case before the Court below. The petitioner was a candidate on behalf of the Congress Party in the last Municipal election from Ward No. 12 of Jeypore Municipality and opp. Party No. 3 who was declared elected as a councillor was a B.J.D. Party candidate. Two other candidates (opp. Parties 2 and 4) contested the said election. Polling was held on 19.9.2003 from 8.00 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. and counting took place on 20.9.2003 on which date result of the election was declared by the Returning Officer and opp.party No. 3 was declared to be elected as a councillor by a margin of seven votes against the petitioner. The petitioner filed the aforesaid election Petition inter alia on the ground that fake vo...
State of Orissa, Represented Through the Principal Secretaty to Govern ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-02-2006
Reported in: 102(2006)CLT606; [2007(112)FLR447]; 2006(II)OLR250
I.M. Quddusi, J.1. This writ application has been filed against the judgment and order dated 4.11.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench in O.A. No. 220 of 2004 which was filed by the opposite party No. 1, inter alia, praying for setting aside the Disciplinary Proceeding initiated against him on the ground that the same were initiated after four years from the date of the alleged cause of action. The Tribunal allowed the O.A. and quashed the departmental proceedings.2. The brief facts of the case are that opposite party No. 1 was selected through the Union Public Service Commission in the year 1967 as a Member of Indian Forest Service and was allocated Orissa State Cadre on 1.7.1968. During his service period, he was posted as Managing Director of Orissa Forest Development Corporation Ltd. with effect from 24.10.1996 and continued till 24.8.1999. Thereafter he was transferred to the regular cadre and was superannuated from service on 31.8.2001. After about fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›