Orissa Court July 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Upendranath Chinara Vs. Khurda Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-03-2003
Reported in: (2004)IIILLJ367Ori
R.K. Patra, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order terminating his services as Branch Manager communicated in office order No. 4228 dated October 13, 1997 (Annexure-3) as well as the judgment dated November 8, 2001 (Annexure-4) passed by the Member, Co-operative Tribunal, Orissa in Service Dispute No. 184 of 1997.2. The facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are as follows:While the petitioner was serving as Branch Manger, Balianta Branch of Khurda Central Co-operative Bank Limited, a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against him on the basis of five charges. The Enquiry Officer found him guilty of the charges. The Appointment Committee of the aforesaid Co-operative Bank on consideration of the report terminated his service as communicated by the impugned Order No. 4228 dated October 13, 1997 (Annexure-3). Being aggrieved by the order of termination, he raised dispute under Section 67-B of the Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1962 bef...
Raja Pal Vs. Election Officer-cum-block Development Officer and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-02-2003
Reported in: 96(2003)CLT663; 2003(II)OLR283
A. K. Patnaik, J.1. The opposite party No: 3 was declared elected as a Panchayat Samiti member of Rairakhol Panchayat Samiti. On 8.3.2002, Election Misc. Case No. 48 of 2002 was filed by the petitioner under Section 44-B of the Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sambalpur challenging the election of opposite party No. 3 as Samiti Member. On 20.9.2002, opposite party No. 3 filed a petition challenging the maintainability of the said Election Misc. Case No. 48 of 2002 on the ground that a sum of Rs. 200/- as security for the cost has not been deposited along with the election petition and the election petition was liable to be dismissed for non-compliance of the provisions of the said Section 44-B of the Act. The petitioner filed an objection to the said petition dated 20.9.2002 filed by the opposite party No. 3 contending inter alia that the provisions of Section 44-B of the Act were complied with. The learned Civil Judge refused to decid...
Shantibala Alias Shantilata Dei Vs. Krushna Chandra Samantaray and ors ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-02-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Ori9
P.K. Tripathy, J.1. Plaintiff in Money Suit No. 374 of 1974 of the Subordinate Judge, First CourL, Cutback is the appellant and the defendants 1 and 4 are respectively the respondents. Plaintiff filed the suit for realisation of Rest. 14,463.43 paise including damages from defendants Nos. 1 and 4 jointly and severally. As per the impugned judgment passed on 3-10-1981, learned Subordinate Judge, granted the decree as against the defendant No. 1 with cost and dismissed the suit on contest against the defendant No. 4. Hence, the plaintiff has filed this appeal to make liable defendant No. 4 for payment of the decretal dues jointly and severally with the defendant No. 1. Plaintiff filed the appeal as a pauper and after disposal of that application on 28-4-1987 the First Appeal was registered.2. Most of the facts are admitted position on record being supported by judgments and orders passed by the Civil Courts in earlier proceedings. Be that as it may, the case as projected by the plaintiff...
State of Orissa Vs. Harihara Pradhan
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jul-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(II)OLR187
M. Papanna, J.1. State of Orissa brought this appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'The Act'). The appellant challenged judgment of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Deogarh in L. A. Case No.'72 of 1999'awarding a sum of Rs. 1,02.48 1.92 P. for acquired land of respondent. Rs. 3000/- for acquired trees standing thereon and Rs. 5000/- for changing of residence.2. Facts leading to the present appeal are like this -The State Government acquired land of the respondent to the extent of Ac. 5.12 decimals in Jambunal mouza for construction of Rengali Dam Project. In this connection there was notification under Section 4(1) of the Act being published in Orissa Gazette vide EOG No. 1030 dated 18.7.1982. The State fixed the market value of the acquired land at. Rs. 22,160.50 P. The Claimant challenged the award of compensation as fixed by the Government before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Deogarh.3. The Claimant on receip...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›