Orissa Court April 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Janaki Bohidar and Others Vs. Pradip Kumar Bohidar and Others
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Ori101; 92(2001)CLT414
P.K. Misra, J.1. This civil revision is directed against the reversing order passed by the Addl. District Judge, Bolangir, directing grant of Succession Certificate in favour of opposite party No. 1. Opposite party No. 1 filed application under section 317 of the Indian Succession Act before the Subordinate Judge, Bolangir, for grant of Succession Certificate on the basis of a Will allegedly executed by Braja Bihari Bohidar. There is no dispute that the aforesaid Braja Bihari Bohidar was a bachelor. Opposite party No. 1 is a nephew of Braja Bihari, being son of one brother. The petitioners who were arrayed as opposite parties are respectively the widow and two sons of deceased's brother and the brother of Braja Bihari. There is no dispute that Braja Bihari died on 2-9-1987. Opposite party No. 1 claims that Braja Bihari had executed the Will on 4-5-1979 and bequeathed all his property in favour of opposite party No. 1. The present petitioners have tiled objection denying the execution o...
Rubbani Trading Co. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
Reported in: [2001]123STC609(Orissa)
N.Y. Hanumanthappa, C.J.1. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. As the petitioner-company did not furnish the return under Rule 7 of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack-1 Range, Cuttack, issued a notice dated November 2, 2000 under the Rule 12(5) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957 in form No. IV as per annexure 1 followed by annexure 7. The same is extracted hereunder :Annexure 1'FORM IVSchedule V--Form No. 96Notice under Rule 12(5) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957.To Rubbani Trading Co., (Dealer)Malgodown, Cuttack (Address)CUCIE 2007 (Registration number)In order to enable me to satisfy myself whether the return filed by you under Rule 7 of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957, for the quarter ending 1997-98 is correct and complete ;Whereas you, a registered dealer under the...
Arnapurna Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3019; 2001(I)OLR572
A.S. Naidu, J.1. Pursuant to an order dated August, 24.2000 passed by the District Magistrate, Puri (hereinafter referred to as 'the detaining authority'), in exercise of powers conferred Under Section 3. Sub-section (2) of the National Security Act. 1980 (for short, 'the Act') Narayan Sahoo alias Narua (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu') a resident of Puri, who was already in custody with effect from 14.8.2000 in connection with Puri P.S. Case No. 141 dated August 14,2000 was detained with a view to prevent him from committing further criminal activities. The mother of the detenu has filed this writ challenging the grounds of detention and praying to issue a writ of Habeas-Corpus declaring the detention to be illegal, unconstitutional and to quash the order of detention.2. The order of detention which is annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ application clearly catalogues a series of violent activities said to have been committed by the detenu which created a tremor of terror in the...
Soma Oram Vs. Chairman, Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
Reported in: 2001(I)OLR663
P.K. Misra, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ application seeking for a direction to opposite parties not to draw high-voltage tower line across and above the petitioner's residential house situated on Plot No. 482/3843, Khata No. 1 15/71 in mauza Jalda, P. S. Raghunathpalli in the district of Sundergarh. It is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite parties are taking the high-voltage Tower-line from Panposh Power House to the Modernization Plant of the Rourkela Steel Plant and such line is to be drawn across and above the house of the petitioner It has been asserted that this has been done without following the proper procedure. It is further stated that though the petitioner has made representation, the Plan is not being changed.2. The opposite parties in their counter have stated that the line in question would pass over barren lands and open space and is not likely to affect any residential house of any person. It has been further submitted that the said line is required...
Laxmi Mani Soren Vs. Orissa Khadi and Village Industries Board and ors ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-04-2001
Reported in: 92(2001)CLT131; 2001(II)OLR18
A.S. Naidu, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as a Junior Accountant on 2-8-85 and was promoted to the post of Senior Accountant on 14-10-88 in the establishment of the Orissa Khadi and Village Industries Board (in short 'the Board'). Admittedly the petitioner is a lady belonging to Scheduled Tribe Community. She has approached the portals of this Court being aggrieved by the action of the Board which is not considering her case for promotion to the post of Accounts Supervisor. Itis alleged that on 22-4-92, ignoring the claim of the petitioner, opp. parties promoted opp. party No. 6 to the post of AccountsSupervisor, for which the petitioner is constrained to file the present writ application.2. It is specifically submitted by the petitioner that she being a Scheduled Tribe woman, in consonance with the Orissa Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (for S. C. and S. T.) Act, 1975 and the Orissa Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (for S. C. and S. T.) Rules...
Sri Chandrasekhar Mohapatra Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Apr-03-2001
Reported in: 92(2001)CLT348
ORDER1. Heard.2. This application under section 482, Cr.P.C. is disposed of at the stage of hearing on admission.3. In the F. I. R. in G. R. Case No. 7 of 2001 of the court of J. M. F. C.. Soro, the Circle Inspector of Police, Sadar Circle, Balasore, has alleged that on the ground of non-arrest of the culprits in a case of gang rape vide Simulia P. S. Case No. 149 dated 30-12-2000, some local leaders and people belonging to a Political patty on 3-1-2001, held a meeting from 1.30 p. m. to 4 p. m. on the premises of Lord Sival temple situated opposite to Simulia Police-station and made inflamatory speeches. At about 4. p. m. they came in front of the said Police-station and besides raising anti-police slogan, they blockade the National Highway No. 5 at that spot from about 4 p. m, to 7 p. m, , During that period, they brought the road traffic to a stand still and did not adhere the request of the informant and other Police personnels so also many persons travelling in light and heavy veh...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›