Orissa Court March 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prasanta Kumar Majhi Vs. Managing Director, Orissa Mining Corporation, ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-02-2001
Reported in: 2002ACJ942; 91(2001)CLT535; [2001(91)FLR274]; (2001)IILLJ77Ori
Pradipta Ray, J. 1. The appellant is a Truck driver in the Orissa Mining Corporation (in short 'Corporation'). At the material time he was working as the driver of a Truck beating No, ORY 3350 of the Corporation. On July 9, 1990 while he was driving the said Truck, an accident took place on National Highway No. 5. The appellant filed a claim case before the Assistant Labour Cominissioner-cum-Commissioner for workmen's Comensation, Cuttack claiming compensation of Rs. 1 lakh alleging that he had suffered 100% loss of earning capacity. By the judgment and order dated April 27, 1992 the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner assessed the loss of earning capacity at 35% and awarded a compensation of Rs. 34,895/-. The Insurance Company. filed Misc. Appeal No. 374 of 1992 in this Court. By judgment and order- dated February 16, 1995 the Hon'ble Single Judge allowed the said appeal and set aside the judgment and order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. Being aggrieved the present ap...
Arun Kumar Guru Vs. Orissa Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Through ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-02-2001
Reported in: 91(2001)CLT693; 2001(I)OLR684
P.C. Naik, J.1. The petitioner, who is serving under the opposite party as an Assistant Law Officer, has approached this Court for issuance an appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the opposite party 'to create higher post i. e. Law Officer in the Legal Branch of the Corporation and throw open the chances of promotion to the petitioner and pass such other orders as the ends of justice requires'.2. The facts involved in this case are simple.Admittedly, the petitioner is a Law Graduate. On being sponsored by the State Employment Exchange, Bhubaneswar for the post of Legal Assistant, he was duly selected and appointed as such under the opposite party vide appointment order issued to him on 11-8-1986 which post he joined the same day. It is averred by the petitioner that the Government in various Departments had in December, 1988 redesignated the post of Legal Assistant as Assistant Law Officer carrying the same status andscale of pay. Subsequent thereto, the Corporation also red...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›