Orissa Court January 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Kumar Kar and ors. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-07-1998
Reported in: [1998(79)FLR809]; (1998)ILLJ1044Ori
Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present writ petition by Ramesh Kumar Kar and 17 others who are now working in the Safety Engineering in Rourkela Steel Plant being designated as Safety Inspectors have asked for the following reliefs :'.... .to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other suitable writ directing the opposite parties to take immediate steps to comply with the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules so as to extend all the benefits as provided under Clause (2)(c) of Rule 61-A of the Orissa Factories Rules, 1950 and such compliance be made with retrospective effect i.e. from the date of appointment of each of the petitioners and extend all other service benefits from retrospective effect as permissible under law.'2. The grievance of the petitioners is that they are discharging the duties of Safety Officers as envisaged under Rule 61-A (3)(a) of the Orissa Factories Rules, 1950. It is contended that such duties as enumerated in the said Rules are allotted/entrusted ...
Nalco Workers Union Vs. Asst. Labour Commissioner
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-06-1998
Reported in: (1998)IILLJ443Ori
1. We have repeatedly observed that bad cases stand on the way of disposal of good cases. The present case is a glaring example and an illustration for the said proposition. Nalco Workers Union has filed the present writ petition praying for the following reliefs:'The petitioner therefore most fervently pray(s) that this Hon'ble Court will be pleaded to admit the application and issue notice to the opposite party and after hearing issue the following writs.1. A writ of certiorari quashing the order of Assistant Labour Commissioner (i.e. Annexure -7 dated February 22, 1994)2. A writ of mandamus directing opposite party to hold conciliation on the charter of demands.3. And any other writ and/ or orders as may deem fit and proper for fair disposal of the case.'2. The sole opposite party is the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Angul. We have perused the writ petition and also perused the impugned order, copy whereof is Annexure 7. The Workers' Union has highlighted the demand for abolition o...
Butu Naik and ors. Vs. Saraswati Devi
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-05-1998
Reported in: AIR1998Ori119
ORDERP.K. Misra, J. 1. Defendants are the appellants against a confirming decision in a suit for declaration of right, title and interest over the disputed land and for recovery of possession and mesne profits. 2. According to the plaintiff's case, the disputed land had been settled with the plaintiff in O.E.A. Case No. 696 by order dated 9-4-1971 and she is possessing the disputed land thereafter by inducting tenants. 3. Defendant No. 1 alone contested the suit and others were set ex parte. Defendant No. 1 took the plea that the alleged settlement of the land under the O.E.A. Act was illegal. We further pleaded that he is in cultivating possession of the disputed land since more than thirty years and has perfected title by adverse possession. 4. Both the Courts below referring to Ext. 1 held that the disputed land had been settled with the plaintiff under the Orissa Estates Abolition Act and as such the plaintiff had title in respect of the disputed property. It was further found that...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›