Orissa Court August 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Preetam General Store Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(II)OLR270
P.K. Misra, J.1. Petitioner has challenged the order under Annexture-1 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Bhubaneswar-I Circle, cancelling the registration certificate of the petitioner under Section 7(4)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act and the order of the revisional authority under Annexure-3 confirming the said cancellation.2. Petitioner was a dealer registered under the Orissa Sales Tax Act as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act. A proceeding was initiated by the Sales Tax Officer under Section 9 (6) (a) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act for cancellation of the registration certificate on the allegation that the petitioner's business had been discontinued. The petitioner had filed a show cause, but the Sales Tax Officer cancelled the registration certificate under Section 9(6) (c) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act by order dated 22.5.1995. On the very same day the Sales Tax Officer passed another order under Annexure-1 intimating the petitioner that his registration certificate was cancelled...
The State of Orissa and ors. Vs. Sarat Chandra Pradhan and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(II)OLR236
P.K. Mohanty, J. 1. This civil revision is by the State Government against the order of abatement of the suit passed by the Additional Subordinate Judge. Puri.2. The brief facts of the case are that the State; through the Collector and the Divisional Forest Officer, Puri filed Title Suit No. 59/231 of 1992/88 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Puri for declaration of their right, title and interest over the suit property and that the decree dated 6.4.1983 passed in Original Suit No. 150 of 1981-I was not binding on the plaintiffs, nor does it affect their right, title and possession over the said land. A decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs was claimed. It was pleaded that the suit property was an intermediary interest known as : Laxminarayan Estate and the entire estate vested in the State free from all encumbrances, under the provisions of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act. 1951 (hereinafter called 'the O.E.A...
Tilatama Parida Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALT(Cri)6; 1998CriLJ2606
A. Pasayat, J.1.In this application for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, Tilatama Parida, mother of Bhika alias Sarat Kumar Parida (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu') has questioned legality of order of detention passed by the District Magistrate, Cuttack on 14-9-1996 in purported exercise of powers under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (in short, 'the Act'). Pursuant to the said mittimus, the detenu is interned in Circle Jail, Choudwar.2. Grounds on which the detention has been directed, as indicated in the grounds of detention are that the detenu was creating havoc in different places of Cuttack city by indulging in anti-social activities whereby the public peace and order were adversely affected. His appearance in the localities make the people panic-stricken. People were apprehensive about their safety and security due to such anti-social activities. Though he was arrested and forwarded to custody in several c...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›