Orissa Court June 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laki Harijan Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-19-1997
Reported in: 84(1997)CLT451; 1998CriLJ1129
ORDERP.K. Mishra, J.1. The petitioner has been convicted by the Asst. Sessions Judge, Jeypore, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo, rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The judgment of the trial Court having been confirmed in appeal by the Sessions Judge, the present revision has been filed.2. As per the prosecution case, on the date of incident i.e. 10-3-1991 when the victim, P.W. 1, was going to village Ekataguda at 11 a.m., the accused came and caught hold of the victim and committed rape. Thereafter, the victim disclosed about the incident before P.W. 2, a co-villager and before P.W. 3, her mother. On the same day F.I.R. was lodged by the victim. The victim was medically examined, her wearing apparels were seized and sent for chemical examination. The accused was also medically examined and subsequently on completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed....
isram Bariha and 2 ors. Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-18-1997
Reported in: 1997(II)OLR165
A. Pasayat, J. 1. The three appellants Isram Bariha, Sadarsingh Bariha and Sundarsingh Bariha (hereinafter described as 'accused') were tried for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'I.P.C.'). They faced trial for allegedly having been responsible for the death of one Amarsingh Bar ha (hereinafter called the 'deceased'). 2. Prosecution version sans unnecessary details is as follows On 28.9.1990. at about 7 A.M., the accused appellants throttled the deceased in Tipisorar jungle. Bansilal Bariha (P.W.I) lodged information at the Jonk Police Station indicating, inter alia, that on return home at midday, his mother told that his father, the deceased, had gone put but had not returned for a long time. Being apprehensive that some danger had befallen his father, he and his young brother Ganesh Bariha went out to search for their father They searched at different places and ultimately found the ridges of their land known...
Rani Sardar Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-18-1997
Reported in: 1997(II)OLR168
A.Pasayat, J. 1. A child of tender age lost his life on 21.l0.1990. Rani Sardar, the accused-appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') is alleged to be the perpetrator of the heinous crime of taking away his life and thereafter throwing the dead body into the river. 2. Filtering out unnecessary details, the prosecution version which led to her trial is as follows: On 21.10.1990. Repa alias Kalidas (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased') was playing with three other young children: Tow of them, Kinki Sardar and Sakarmani Sardah (P.Ws.2 and 3) were claimed to be the playmates. The accused came to the place where they were playing and persuaded them to go with her towards a river by holding out an assurance to give them some fruits. In this deceitful manner, she took the deceased and the other children to the place of Occurrence near river Khadakhai. Sending out the others on sortie pretext she caught-hold of the child,-forcibly made him lie down on the ground, pressed his ...
Durjodhan Ray Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-18-1997
Reported in: 85(1998)CLT114; 1997(II)OLR514
A. Pasayat, J. 1. In this appeal from jail, Durjodhan Ray (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') calls in question legality of his conviction for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'IPC'), and sentence of imprisonment for life, as awarded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sambalpur. Accused stood charged for allegedly having committed homicidal death of Purushottam Ray (hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased').2. In a nut-shell, prosecution case is as follows :On 8.6.1990 information was lodged at Laikera Police Station to the effect the that the accused caused homicidal death of deceased by pelting stones at him. Due to pelting of stones bleeding injuries were caused, which led to death of the deceased ultimately. Information was lodged by Rukman Baboo (P.W.6) who claimed to be an eye-witness to the occurrence along with several others. The time of incident was indicated to be around 10, a.m. in the morning. On the basi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›