Orissa Court September 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjaya Memorial Institute of Technology and anr. Vs. State of Orissa ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-01-1993
Reported in: 1993(II)OLR435
B.L. Hansaria, C.J.1. The petitioners, who are Sanjaya Memorial Institute of Technology and its President, have assailed the the validity of Section 2(i) of the Orissa Education (Amendment Act, 1991 by which Clause (f) of Section 3 of the Orissa Education Act, 1969 (hereinafter, the Act) was amended by substituting the words 'or any institution imparting technical education in the State' ''for the words 'other than an institution for technical education not under the control of the Education Department of the State Government'.2. Clause (f) aforesaid is a part of the definition section and has defined the expression 'educational institutions'. The effect of the amendment is that any institution imparting technical education in the State has become an educational institution. The validity has been assailed on the ground that the State Legislature had no competence to enact inasmuch as the field is covered by Entry 66 of List I of Schedule VII of the Constitution of India. That Entry rea...
Narayan Parida Vs. Artabandhu Jena
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-01-1993
Reported in: 1993(II)OLR485
G.B. Pattnaik, J.1. Defendant is the appellant against an affirming decision in a suit for declaration of title, confirmation of possession and injunction in respect of the disputed land measuring Ac.2 .00 1/2 decimals in mauza Pandiakera and Bagipada as per the schedule appended to the plaint.2. Plaintiffs case in nutshell is that he was the exclusive owner in possession of the suit land. But on account of his old age as he found it difficult to manage the settlement work himself, he decided to authorise the defendant who happens to be his sister's son to look after the settlement operation on his behalf. For that purpose he intended to execute a power-of-attorney in favour of the defendant on 12-8-1972. He came to Sakhigopal and registered the document. The document was scribed by a Deed Writer of the choice of the defendant and plaintiff in good faith executed the same believing it to be a power-of- attorney. On 10-10-1977, when defendant threatened to interfere with the plaintiffs ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›