Orissa Court January 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krushna Chandra Bisoi @ Bisoyi Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-11-1991
Reported in: 1992(I)OLR329
L. Rath, J.1. The petitioner having been convicted under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to RI for three years for causing multiple stab injuries to PW 1 and his appeal against the conviction having failed, has approached this Court in revision.2. The facts in a nutshell, as revealed by the prosecution, are that PW 1 had been suspecting illicit affair between Tribeni, the wife of his elder brother Bhuban and the petitioner and that he had also informed the same to his brother but who had not taken any action in the matter. He also got the matter agitated in the village Panchayat but there Bhuban had rather opined as to why his wife was being unnecessarily alleged against. All the same, PW 1 was on the look out to catch hold of the petitioner red-handed and on the day of occurrence, 7-8-1983 at about 9.00 p. m. he saw the petitioner in the room of Tribeni. Both PW 1 and his brother reside jointly and had three rooms of which one was occupied by Bhuban and another by him and the third room...
Subash Chandra Padhi Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-03-1991
Reported in: 71(1991)CLT299; 1991(I)OLR270
J.M. Mahapatra, J.1. The revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 31-3-1982 of the learned Sessions Judge, Ganjam- Boudh, Berhampur, maintaining the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Asst. Sessions Judge, Berhampur, convicting the petitioner Under Section 395, I. P. C. and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are these. There was a dacoity in the house of the informant, P. W. 1, in the night of 15-2-1978 in course of which the petitioner and six others were alleged to have forcibly entered into the house of P. W. 1 and removed jewellery and cash. On an information being lodged by P. W. 1, the S. I. of Jarada police statbn, P. W. 17, took up investigation of the case and eventually submitted charge sheet against seven accused persons including the petitioner. In course of investigation several seizures have been made. Some recoveries are also said to have been made from some of the accused per...
Dr. Debendranath Tripathy and Two ors. Vs. State of Orissa and Five or ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-03-1991
Reported in: II(1991)ACC591; 1991ACJ619; 71(1991)CLT289; 1991(I)OLR359
L. Rath, J.1. Since all these three applications relate to one incident in respect of which cognizance has been taken by the reamed Sub-Divisional judicial Magistrate, Sadar Cuttack, Under Sections 304 and 201 read with Section 34, I. P. C, they are disposed of by this common judgment. Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in Criminal Wise. Case No. 895/87 are opp. party Nos. 2, 4 and 5 in Criminal Misc. Case So. 845 of 1987 and the petitioner in Criminal Misc Case No. 1045 of 1389 is opp. party No. 3 in Criminal Misc Case No. 845 of. 1987 whereas the petitioners in Criminal Misc. Case Nos. 845 and 895 of 1337 figure as opp. party Nos 2 to 7 in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1045 of 1989.2. The prosecution case in respect of which charge-sheet was filed against the respective petitioners related to an incident in which a hydrocele operation of one Rabindra Kumar Patnaik, an Assistant Engineer, was carried out in a private clinic in charge of the petitioner in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1045 of 1989, an Ass...
Kisan Khandelwal Vs. Karunakar Das and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-02-1991
Reported in: 1991(I)OLR114
S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. This is a revision by the accused against the revisional order of the learned Sessions judge.2. On 26-1-1977 at about 10 A.M. son of opp. party No. 1 sustained fracture wound as a result of accident caused by the driver of a scooter. Since the accused was not known, on 29-1-1977 opp. party No. 1 reported the incident at the police station without indicating name of the accused. After coming to know the name of the accused, he intimated the same to police sometimes thereafter. On the basis of the information, C. R. Case No. 142 of 1977 was registered in the Court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Balasore, without knowledge that charge sheet was submitted against petitioner on basis of which cognisance of the offence Under Sections 279 and 338 I.P.C. was taken summoning petitioner to stand trial, opp. party No 1 filed a complaint in the Court on 12-7-1978 against the petitioner where it was stated that informition was lodged before police. On 1-8-1978 two witne...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›